Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26464511›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Whole-agent selectivity within the macaque face-processing system.

Clark Fisher, Winrich A Freiwald

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neural Encoding of Bodies for Primate Social Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Face shape processingFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The Functional Organization of High-Level Visual Cortex Determines the Representation of Complex Visual Stimuli.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clark FisherLaboratory of Neural Systems, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065 cfisher@rockefeller.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0707-1613
Winrich A FreiwaldLaboratory of Neural Systems, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.
Rockefeller University · US

Funding

Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan-Kettering MST ProgramT32GM007739 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI HSU, KATHARINE C · 1985 to 2023
$51.1M
Neural Mechanisms of Face RecognitionR01EY021594 · NEI · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI FREIWALD, WINRICH · 2014 to 2019
$2.6M
NEI NIH HHS 1R01EY021594-01A1NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021594NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007739PHS HHS NIGMS T32GM007739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primate brain contains a set of face-selective areas, which are thought to extract the rich social information that faces provide, such as emotional state and personal identity. The nature of this information raises a fundamental question about these face-selective areas: Do they respond to a face purely because of its visual attributes, or because the face embodies a larger social agent? Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to determine whether the macaque face patch system exhibits a whole-agent response above and beyond its responses to individually presented faces and bodies. We found a systematic development of whole-agent preference through the face patches, from subadditive integration of face and body responses in posterior face patches to superadditive integration in anterior face patches. Superadditivity was not observed for faces atop nonbody objects, implying categorical specificity of face-body interaction. Furthermore, superadditivity was robust to visual degradation of facial detail, suggesting whole-agent selectivity does not require prior face recognition. In contrast, even the body patches immediately adjacent to anterior face areas did not exhibit superadditivity. This asymmetry between face- and body-processing systems may explain why observers attribute bodies' social signals to faces, and not vice versa. The development of whole-agent selectivity from posterior to anterior face patches, in concert with the recently described development of natural motion selectivity from ventral to dorsal face patches, identifies a single face patch, AF (anterior fundus), as a likely link between the analysis of facial shape and semantic inferences about other agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsCognitionFacial RecognitionFixation, OcularMacaca mulattaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationSocial Behaviorbody patchesface patchesvisual contextvisual integration

Identifiers

PMID26464511
PMCPMC4664356
OpenAlexW2234186126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.