ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2016
A novel narrow profile articulating powered vascular stapler provides superior access and haemostasis equivalent to conventional devices†.
Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the utility of slow mode for pulmonary vessel resection using a surgical stapler in anatomical pulmonary resection: a prospective randomized controlled trial protocol.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes among patients undergoing lung resection using ECHELONJournal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Impact of Narrow Anvil Stapler on Graft Vein Length in Right-sided Living-donor Nephrectomy.Transplantation direct · 2025Article
- Comparison of active versus passive robotic-endoscope-holder-assisted unisurgeon uniportal thoracoscopic surgery in terms of surgical efficacy and patient safety.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the validated intraoperative bleeding scale in liver surgery: study protocol for a multicenter prospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Thoracic surgery in Hong Kong.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Review
- Economic impact of powered stapler in video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for lung Cancer in a Chinese tertiary hospital: a cost-minimization analysis.Health economics review · 2022Article
- Hybrid operating room-one stop for diagnosis, staging and treatment of early stage NSCLC.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Article
- The powered vascular staple (PVS) versus conventional powered linier cutter (PLC) for the application of bronchial transection in thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- Clinical outcomes following an initial experience with a novel powered vascular stapler in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies: results of a Chinese multi-center study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- How to prevent adverse events of vascular stapling in thoracic surgery: recommendations based on a clinical and experimental study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
- Impact of Powered and Tissue-Specific Endoscopic Stapling Technology on Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy Procedures: A Retrospective, Observational Study.Advances in therapy · 2018Observational
- Technological innovation in video-assisted thoracic surgery.Journal of visualized surgery · 2017Article
- Recent clinical innovations in thoracic surgery in Hong Kong.Journal of thoracic disease · 2016Review
- Hybrid theatre and alternative localization techniques in conventional and single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.Journal of thoracic disease · 2016Review
- Single port VATS: recent developments in Asia.Journal of thoracic disease · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCurrent endoscopic transection devices are not optimized to meet the unique challenges posed by the task of vessel transection in difficult-to-access locations within the pleural cavity. The ECHELON FLEX™ powered vascular stapler (PVS) has been designed with four rows of staples instead of six, to decrease its size and enable more precise placement on fragile pulmonary vessels, using a narrower anvil than other commercially available transecting devices. This study was performed to determine whether the reduced number of staple rows affects haemostasis, and to assess surgeons' initial impression of the smaller stapler during in vivo usage.
methodsThe new four-row stapler was compared with commercially available six-row articulating staplers via expert graders using a validated scale of haemostasis in vivo after application on porcine gastroepiploic pedicles and other thin- and thick-walled vessels. The new stapler was then compared with current products by practising thoracic surgeons (n = 27) during in vivo usage of simulated pulmonary procedures in a porcine model. The surgeons were also surveyed on the key attributes of the four-row stapler in relation to the six-row predicates.
resultsHaemostasis evaluated on an ordered scale was clinically equivalent between the test and predicate staplers, and was deemed acceptable for all thin- and thick-vascular tissue applications. Surgeons found no difference in haemostasis between the four- and six-row staplers (P = 0.486), and judged the four-row stapler superior in terms of access, reduced need for dissection, reduced stress of surgeon and precise control (P < 0.001 for all).
conclusionsThe new ECHELON FLEX™ PVS provides haemostasis equivalent to six-row staplers. With a smaller anvil, narrower shaft and wider angle of articulation, the PVS demonstrated improved access capability for pulmonary vessel procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.