Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26464435›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2015

Explaining the striking difference in twist-stretch coupling between DNA and RNA: A comparative molecular dynamics analysis.

Korbinian Liebl, Tomas Drsata, Filip Lankas, Jan Lipfert, Martin Zacharias

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. On the common pathways of deformation: RNA vs DNA under interrogation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Universality in RNA and DNA deformations induced by salt, temperature change, stretching force, and protein binding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. 3D RNA-scaffolded wireframe origami.Nature communications · 2023
    Article
  18. Twisting DNA by salt.Nucleic acids research · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Korbinian LieblPhysik-Department T38, Technische Universität München, James-Franck-Strasse, D-85748 Garching, Germany.
Tomas DrsataInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Flemingovo namesti 2, 166 10 Prague, Czech Republic Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University Prague, Albertov 6, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic.
Filip LankasInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Flemingovo namesti 2, 166 10 Prague, Czech Republic Laboratory of Informatics and Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan LipfertDepartment of Physics, Center for Nanoscience (CeNS), and Nanosystems Initiative Munich (NIM), Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, 80799 Munich, Germany.
Martin ZachariasPhysik-Department T38, Technische Universität München, James-Franck-Strasse, D-85748 Garching, Germany martin.zacharias@ph.tum.de.
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry · CZTechnical University of Munich · DENanosystems Initiative Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Double stranded helical DNA and RNA are flexible molecules that can undergo global conformational fluctuations. Their bending, twisting and stretching deformabilities are of similar magnitude. However, recent single-molecule experiments revealed a striking qualitative difference indicating an opposite sign for the twist-stretch couplings of dsDNA and dsRNA [Lipfert et al. 2014. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 15408] that is not explained by existing models. Employing unconstrained Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations we are able to reproduce the qualitatively different twist-stretch coupling for dsDNA and dsRNA in semi-quantitative agreement with experiment. Similar results are also found in simulations that include an external torque to induce over- or unwinding of DNA and RNA. Detailed analysis of the helical deformations coupled to twist indicate that the interplay of helical rise, base pair inclination and displacement from the helix axis upon twist changes are responsible for the different twist-stretch correlations. Overwinding of RNA results in more compact conformations with a narrower major groove and consequently reduced helical extension. Overwinding of DNA decreases the size of the minor groove and the resulting positive base pair inclination leads to a slender and more extended helical structure.

Indexed as

Base PairingBiomechanical PhenomenaDNAMolecular Dynamics SimulationNucleic Acid ConformationRNA, Double-StrandedTorqueDNARNA, Double-Stranded

Identifiers

PMID26464435
PMCPMC4666353
OpenAlexW2263081824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.