Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26464429›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2016

Architecture design of a generic centralized adjudication module integrated in a web-based clinical trial management system.

Wenle Zhao, Keith Pauls

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Should we adjudicate outcomes in stroke trials? A systematic review.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wenle ZhaoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA zhaow@musc.edu.
Keith PaulsDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Funding

POINT: PLATELET-ORIENTED INHIBITION IN NEW TIAU01NS062835 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI EASTON, J. DONALD, ELM, JORDAN J. · 2009 to 2017
$56.0M
ProTECT IIIU01NS062778 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI WRIGHT, DAVID W · 2009 to 2013
$26.4M
Workshop to Identify Collaborative Project(s) for the NIH StrokeNet and the Japan NEtwork for Clinical Stroke Trials (NECST)U01NS087748 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Catherine R. Dillon, Jordan J. Elm · 2014 to 2026
$14.1M
Neurological Emergencies Treatment Trials Network Statistical and Data ManagementU01NS059041 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DURKALSKI, VALERIE L, PALESCH, YUKO Y · 2006 to 2015
$9.1M
Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT) - SDMCU01NS088023 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI ELM, JORDAN J. · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NINDS NIH HHS U01NS0059041NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS059041NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS062778NINDS NIH HHS U01NS062778NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS062835NINDS NIH HHS U01NS062835NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS087748NINDS NIH HHS U01NS087748NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS088023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCentralized outcome adjudication has been used widely in multicenter clinical trials in order to prevent potential biases and to reduce variations in important safety and efficacy outcome assessments. Adjudication procedures could vary significantly among different studies. In practice, the coordination of outcome adjudication procedures in many multicenter clinical trials remains as a manual process with low efficiency and high risk of delay. Motivated by the demands from two large clinical trial networks, a generic outcome adjudication module has been developed by the network's data management center within a homegrown clinical trial management system. In this article, the system design strategy and database structure are presented.

methodsA generic database model was created to transfer different adjudication procedures into a unified set of sequential adjudication steps. Each adjudication step was defined by one activate condition, one lock condition, one to five categorical data items to capture adjudication results, and one free text field for general comments. Based on this model, a generic outcome adjudication user interface and a generic data processing program were developed within a homegrown clinical trial management system to provide automated coordination of outcome adjudication.

resultsBy the end of 2014, this generic outcome adjudication module had been implemented in 10 multicenter trials. A total of 29 adjudication procedures were defined with the number of adjudication steps varying from 1 to 7. The implementation of a new adjudication procedure in this generic module took an experienced programmer 1 or 2 days. A total of 7336 outcome events had been adjudicated and 16,235 adjudication step activities had been recorded. In a multicenter trial, 1144 safety outcome event submissions went through a three-step adjudication procedure and reported a median of 3.95 days from safety event case report form submission to adjudication completion. In another trial, 277 clinical outcome events were adjudicated by a six-step procedure and took a median of 23.84 days from outcome event case report form submission to adjudication procedure completion.

conclusionA generic outcome adjudication module integrated in the clinical trial management system made the automated coordination of efficacy and safety outcome adjudication a reality.

Indexed as

InternetSystems IntegrationTreatment OutcomeDatabases, FactualHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPatient SafetyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicClinical trialclinical trial management systemendpoint adjudicationmedical safety monitoringoutcome adjudication

Identifiers

PMID26464429
PMCPMC4785064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.