Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26464427›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2015

Breast Cancer Risk in Relation to Ambient Air Pollution Exposure at Residences in the Sister Study Cohort.

Kerryn W Reding, Michael T Young, Adam A Szpiro, Claire J Han, Lisa A DeRoo, Clarice Weinberg, Joel D Kaufman, Dale P Sandler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of Pollution on Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Focus on Air Pollution.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Ambient Air Pollution Exposure and Breast Cancer Risk Worldwide: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Air Pollution and Breast Cancer Incidence in the Multiethnic Cohort Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Exposure to outdoor ambient air toxics and risk of breast cancer: The multiethnic cohort.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Additive effects of 10-year exposures to PMEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kerryn W RedingUniversity of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, Washington. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Public Health Sciences, Seattle, Washington. kreding@uw.edu.
Michael T YoungUniversity of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington.
Adam A SzpiroUniversity of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington.
Claire J HanUniversity of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, Washington.
Lisa A DeRooDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Clarice WeinbergNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Epidemiology Branch, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Joel D KaufmanUniversity of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington.
Dale P SandlerNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Epidemiology Branch, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
University of Bergen · NO

Funding

XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Joel Daniel Kaufman · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors For Breast Cancer: The Sister StudyZIAES044005 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANDLER, DALE P · 2009 to 2025
$22.7M
The Two Sister StudyZIAES102245 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WEINBERG, CLARICE · 2009 to 2025
$8.6M
Environmental Factors in Cardiovascular DiseaseK24ES013195 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KAUFMAN, JOEL DANIEL · 2005 to 2014
$1.5M
Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: The Sister StudyZ01ES044005 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANDLER, DALE P · 1999 to 2008
$1.3M
Investigating the Role of a Lifestyle Intervention on Novel Estrogen BiomarkersR00NR012232 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI REDING, KERRYN W · 2012 to 2014
$717k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES044005NIEHS NIH HHS K24 ES013195NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007033NIEHS NIH HHS Z01 ES 044005NINR NIH HHS R00 NR012232NINR NIH HHS R00NR012232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome but not all past studies reported associations between components of air pollution and breast cancer, namely fine particulate matter ≤2.5 μm (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). It is yet unclear whether risks differ according to estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status.

methodsThis analysis includes 47,591 women from the Sister Study cohort enrolled from August 2003 to July 2009, in whom 1,749 invasive breast cancer cases arose from enrollment to January 2013. Using Cox proportional hazards and polytomous logistic regression, we estimated breast cancer risk associated with residential exposure to NO2, PM2.5, and PM10.

resultsAlthough breast cancer risk overall was not associated with PM2.5 [HR = 1.03; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.96-1.11], PM10 (HR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.00), or NO2 (HR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.97-1.07), the association with NO2 differed according to ER/PR subtype (P = 0.04). For an interquartile range (IQR) difference of 5.8 parts per billion (ppb) in NO2, the relative risk (RR) of ER(+)/PR(+) breast cancer was 1.10 (95% CI, 1.02-1.19), while there was no evidence of association with ER(-)/PR(-) (RR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77-1.09; Pinteraction = 0.04).

conclusionsWithin the Sister Study cohort, we found no significant associations between air pollution and breast cancer risk overall. But we observed an increased risk of ER(+)/PR(+) breast cancer associated with NO2. IMPACT: Though these results suggest there is no substantial increased risk for breast cancer overall in relation to air pollution, NO2, a marker of traffic-related air pollution, may differentially affect ER(+)/PR(+) breast cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAir PollutionBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26464427
PMCPMC4686338
OpenAlexW2133032064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.