ArticleHealth education research2015
State legislators' sources and use of information: bridging the gap between research and policy.
Article in Health education research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2020Pooled it
- Effectively communicating with local policymakers: a randomized trial of policy brief dissemination to address obesity.Frontiers in public health · 2024Trial
- Research outcomes informing the selection of public health interventions and strategies to implement them: A cross-sectional survey of Australian policy-maker and practitioner preferences.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Dissemination of public health research to prevent non-communicable diseases: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Open science at the science-policy interface: bringing in the evidence?Health research policy and systems · 2022Review
- Dispersion of contraceptive access policies across the United States from 2006 to 2021.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Embracing policy implementation science to ensure translation of evidence to cancer control policy.Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- European-wide policymaking at the urban level: a qualitative study.European journal of public health · 2021Article
- Use of a quantitative data report in a hypothetical decision scenario for health policymaking: a computer-assisted laboratory study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Using a Twitter Chat to Rapidly Identify Barriers and Policy Solutions for Metastatic Breast Cancer Care: Qualitative Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2021Article
- Policy Implementation Science to Advance Population Health: The Potential for Learning Health Policy Systems.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- "My good friends on the other side of the aisle aren't bothered by those facts": U.S. State legislators' use of evidence in making policy on abortion.Contraception · 2020Article
- Use of research evidence in state health policymaking: Menu labeling policy in California.Preventive medicine reports · 2019Article
- Simulation modeling to assist with childhood obesity control: perceptions of Baltimore City policymakers.Journal of public health policy · 2018Article
- Exploring political influences on evidence-based non-communicable disease prevention across four countries.Health education research · 2018Article
- Introductory Overview of the Natural Experiments for Translation in Diabetes 2.0 (NEXT-D2) Network: Examining the Impact of US Health Policies and Practices to Prevent Diabetes and Its Complications.Current diabetes reports · 2018Review
- Framing research for state policymakers who place a priority on cancer.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2016Article
- The Relationships Between State Health Department Practitioners' Perceptions of Organizational Supports and Evidence-Based Decision-Making Skills.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research can inform policymakers of public health issues and shape policy decisions, hopefully benefiting public health; thus, improving dissemination of research to policymakers is important for developing effective public health policies that improve health and health equity. However, the utilization of research among policymakers is often not fully realized. This study builds upon current knowledge about what types of information legislators seek when working on health issues and where they go for information. Further, it explores what kinds of information legislators find most helpful and if there are ways researchers could better provide this evidence. Key-informant interviews were conducted with 25 U.S. state legislators holding health committee leadership positions between July and November, 2010. Regarding types of information sought, most legislators discussed their desire for data and statistics when working on health-related issues. When asked about their most trusted sources of information, participants mentioned government sources as well as advocacy, lobby and industry groups. A few mentioned universities and healthcare professionals. Results from this study offer public health researchers and practitioners' insights into the types of information that may be most helpful to policymakers. Insights gathered may improve the dissemination of research and bridge the gap between knowledge users and knowledge producers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.