ReviewDer Radiologe2015
[Possibilities of sonographic image fusion: Current developments].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound—New Techniques Are Extending the Applications.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023Article
- Ultrasound fusion biopsy.Der Radiologe · 2021Review
- [Role of the radiologist in surgery of colorectal liver metastases : What should be removed and what must remain].Der Radiologe · 2019Review
- [Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and image fusion for procedures of liver interventions].Der Radiologe · 2018Review
- [Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of the liver : Critical evaluation of use in clinical routine diagnostics].Der Radiologe · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical/methodical issueFor diagnostic and interventional procedures ultrasound (US) image fusion can be used as a complementary imaging technique. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Image fusion has the advantage of real time imaging and can be combined with other cross-sectional imaging techniques. PERFORMANCE: With the introduction of US contrast agents sonography and image fusion have gained more importance in the detection and characterization of liver lesions. ACHIEVEMENTS: Fusion of US images with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) facilitates the diagnostics and postinterventional therapy control. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: In addition to the primary application of image fusion in the diagnosis and treatment of liver lesions, there are more useful indications for contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) in routine clinical diagnostic procedures, such as intraoperative US (IOUS), vascular imaging and diagnostics of other organs, such as the kidneys and prostate gland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26464374What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.