Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26464322›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2015

[Improvement of sonographic visualization of cannula needle tips by alignment of the needle lumen : In vitro investigation of established needle tip forms].

U Schwemmer, T Geppert, T Steinfeldt, C Wunder

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

U SchwemmerKlinik für Anaesthesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Neumarkt, Kliniken des Landkreises Neumarkt i.d.OPf., Nürnberger Str. 12, 92318, Neumarkt i.d.OPf., Deutschland. Ulrich.Schwemmer@klinikum.neumarkt.de.
T GeppertKlinik für innere Medizin, SLK Klinikum am Plattenwald, Bad Friedrichshall, Deutschland.
T SteinfeldtKlinik für Anästhesie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland.
C WunderKlinik und Poliklinik für Anaesthesiologie, Uniklinik Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.
Immanuel Klinikum Bernau · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the context of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks (regional anesthesia), clear visualization of the needle tip and the target structure are mandatory for the performance of a safe puncture and injection. The purpose of this in vitro study was to analyze the visualization of different forms of needle tips and calibers of cannulas in a phantom simulating human tissue, with the help of a standardized image analysis system. Different depths and angles of the puncture needle in relation to the ultrasound probe were tested. MATERIAL AND

methodsCannula needles established for use in regional anesthesia with different surfaces, diameters and needle tip form in 23 different combinations were analyzed. A gelatine-based phantom was used to simulate human tissue. The standardized visualization of the needle tip with the ultrasound probe was performed in plane at different angles (30°, 45° and 60°), depths of penetration (1 cm, 2 cm and 3 cm) and two different alignments of the cannula needle lumen to the ultrasound probe (0° and 180°). The screenshots of the ultrasound pictures were analyzed by quantifying the pixel brightness around the needle tip (region of interest) with a standardized software (score 0-255).

resultsIn this study 1104 ultrasound images of cannula needles were analyzed. Diminished scores (reduced pixel brightness) of the needle tips were documented with increasing distance from the ultrasound probe. Comparison of punctures at angles of 30° and 45° showed no differences in needle tip visibility (same scores) but punctures at an angle of 60° were poorly visualized compared with 30° and 45° (mean scores 87.90 ± 11.60 vs. 78.40 ± 12.07, p < 0.001 and 81.85 ± 11.79 vs. 78.40 ± 12.07, p < 0.001, respectively). The direct alignment of the cannula lumen towards the ultrasound probe (0°) was significantly more easily visualized when compared with the reverse alignment of 180° (mean scores 86.90 ± 12.74 vs. 84.80 ± 11.66, p = 0.003, respectively). No differences in visibility were detected between the different cannula needle diameters examined. The Sprotte cannula showed the best visibility score with respect to the cut of the needle tip (mean score 89.40 ± 11.72).

conclusionThe visibility of cannulas in ultrasound scans depends on the ultrasound frequency, angle of the puncture in relation to the ultrasound probe and the depth of penetration. The results of this study showed that direct alignment of the cannula needle lumen towards the ultrasound probe (0°) independently improved needle tip visualization. This simple measure allows a significant improvement in the safe performance of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, regionalEquipment designGelatineNeedlesPhantoms, imaging

Identifiers

PMID26464322
OpenAlexW1936845441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.