Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26464014›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of antibiotics2016

A systematic review and critical assessment of incentive strategies for discovery and development of novel antibiotics.

Matthew J Renwick, David M Brogan, Elias Mossialos

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of antibiotics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Exploring multidrug resistance patterns in community-acquiredAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Synthetic Biology-Driven Microbial Therapeutics for Disease Treatment.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  20. Combinations ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew J RenwickLSE Health, Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
David M BroganLSE Health, Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Elias MossialosLSE Health, Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance, pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms are reluctant to develop novel antibiotics because of a host of market failures. This problem is complicated by public health goals that demand antibiotic conservation and equitable patient access. Thus, an innovative incentive strategy is needed to encourage sustainable investment in antibiotics. This systematic review consolidates, classifies and critically assesses a total of 47 proposed incentives. Given the large number of possible strategies, a decision framework is presented to assist with the selection of incentives. This framework focuses on addressing market failures that result in limited investment, public health priorities regarding antibiotic stewardship and patient access, and implementation constraints and operational realities. The flexible nature of this framework allows policy makers to tailor an antibiotic incentive package that suits a country's health system structure and needs.

Indexed as

Health PolicyMotivationAnti-Bacterial AgentsDecision Support TechniquesDrug DiscoveryGlobal HealthHumansAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26464014
PMCPMC4775540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.