Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26463725›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2016

Role of short-term use of L. acidophilus DDS-1 and B. lactis UABLA-12 in acute respiratory infections in children: a randomized controlled trial.

S V Gerasimov, V A Ivantsiv, L M Bobryk, O O Tsitsura, L P Dedyshin, N V Guta, B V Yandyo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03377374 (Randomized Controlled Trial on the Safety and Efficacy of L. Reuteri ATCC PTA 5289 & L. Reuteri DSM 17938 for the Treatment of Children With Pharyngitis and/or Tonsillitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03377374 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial on the Safety and Efficacy of L. Reuteri ATCC PTA 5289 & L. Reuteri DSM 17938 for the Treatment of Children With Pharyngitis and/or Tonsillitis: A Proof of Concept

TypeinterventionalSponsorInnovacion y Desarrollo de Estrategias en SaludRan2017 to 2019Enrolled70ConditionsPharyngitis, TonsillitisArmsProbiotic, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Probiotics for preventing acute upper respiratory tract infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Probiotics for preventing acute otitis media in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Nutrients · 2020
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Beneficial Role of ProbioticFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nutrients · 2019
    Article
  17. Nutrients · 2018
    Article
  18. A human origin strainInternational journal of medical sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S V GerasimovDepartment of Pediatrics, Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
V A IvantsivDepartment of Pediatrics, Lviv City Children Hospital, Lviv, Ukraine.
L M BobrykDepartment of Pediatrics, Lviv City Children Hospital, Lviv, Ukraine.
O O TsitsuraDepartment of Pediatrics, Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.
L P DedyshinDepartment of Pediatrics, Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
N V GutaDepartment of Pediatrics, Lviv City Children Hospital, Lviv, Ukraine.
B V YandyoDepartment of Pediatrics, Lviv City Children Hospital, Lviv, Ukraine.
Lviv City Children's Hospital · UADanylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University · UAIvano-Frankivsk National Medical University · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesEvidence suggests that the long-term consumption of probiotics may help in reducing the incidence of or modifying acute respiratory infection (ARI). We assessed the role of the short-term use of probiotics in ARI in children. SUBJECTS/

methodsThis was a randomized, double-blind, controlled study that enrolled 315 children with 90 dropouts. On the first day of appearance of a sick household member, otherwise healthy children of both sexes aged 3-12 years were allocated to receive Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 and Bifidobacterium lactis UABLA-12 (Up4-Junior) in a dose of 5 billion colony-forming units daily with 50 mg of fructooligosaccharide (the probiotic group) or rice maltodexrin (the control group). Test supplementation and follow-up lasted for 2 weeks or until the end of the secondary ARI in a child. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of ARI. Time to resolution and the severity of ARI served the secondary outcome measures.

resultsIn all, 64 of 113 children in the probiotic group (57%) and 73 of 112 children in the control group (65%) developed ARI (P=0.261). Time to resolution of the secondary ARI was shorter in the probiotic group (5.0 (interquartile range (IQR): 4.0-6.0) vs 7.0 (IQR: 6.0-8.0) days, P<0.001). The median severity of ARI was 240 (IQR: 163-350) score-days in the probiotic vs 525 (IQR: 364-736) score-days in the control group (P<0.001).

conclusionsThe short-term use of probiotics does not reduce the incidence, but shortens ARI in preschool and elementary school children.

Indexed as

Bifidobacterium animalisLactobacillus acidophilusChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleProbioticsRespiratory Tract InfectionsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26463725
OpenAlexW2297772458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.