Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26463498›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Smoke-free legislation and the incidence of paediatric respiratory infections and wheezing/asthma: interrupted time series analyses in the four UK nations.

Jasper V Been, Lisa Szatkowski, Tjeerd-Pieter van Staa, Hubert G Leufkens, Onno C van Schayck, Aziz Sheikh, Frank de Vries, Patrick Souverein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Smoke-free legislation and child health.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jasper V BeenDivision of Neonatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Lisa SzatkowskiUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Nottingham, Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Tjeerd-Pieter van StaaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Hubert G LeufkensDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Onno C van SchayckCentre of Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Aziz SheikhCentre of Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Frank de VriesSchool for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Patrick SouvereinDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLUniversity of Edinburgh · GBBrigham and Women's Hospital · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKMedical Research Council MC_PC_13042Medical Research Council MR/K006665/1Medical Research Council MR/K007017/1Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the association between introduction of smoke-free legislation in the UK (March 2006 for Scotland, April 2007 for Wales and Northern Ireland, and July 2007 for England) and the incidence of respiratory diseases among children. We extracted monthly counts of new diagnoses of wheezing/asthma and RTIs among children aged 0-12 years from all general practices in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink during 1997-2012. Interrupted time series analyses were performed using generalised additive mixed models, adjusting for underlying incidence trends, population size changes, seasonal factors, and pandemic influenza, as appropriate. 366,642 new wheezing/asthma diagnoses and 4,324,789 RTIs were observed over 9,536,003 patient-years. There was no statistically significant change in the incidence of wheezing/asthma after introduction of smoke-free legislation in England (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.94, 95% CI 0.81-1.09) or any other UK country (Scotland: IRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.83-1.19; Wales: IRR 1.09, 95% CI 0.89-1.35; Northern Ireland: IRR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76-1.22). Similarly no statistically significant changes in RTI incidence were demonstrated (England: IRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86-1.06; Scotland: IRR 0.96, 95% CI 0.83-1.11; Wales: IRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86-1.09; Northern Ireland: IRR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79-1.03). There were no demonstrable reductions in the incidence of paediatric wheezing/asthma or RTIs following introduction of smoke-free legislation in the UK.

Indexed as

Respiratory SoundsAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolComorbidityFemaleGovernment RegulationHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRespiratory Tract InfectionsRisk FactorsSmoke-Free PolicyTobacco Smoke PollutionTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID26463498
PMCPMC4604467
OpenAlexW2177575874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.