Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26463229›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2015

Assessment of patient safety culture in primary care setting, Al-Mukala, Yemen.

Hana H Webair, Salwa S Al-Assani, Reema H Al-Haddad, Wafa H Al-Shaeeb, Manal A Bin Selm, Abdulla S Alyamani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Patient safety in primary and outpatient health care.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hana H WebairFamily Medicine Department, Hadhramout University College of Medicine, Al-Mukala, Yemen. hhwebair@gmail.com.
Salwa S Al-AssaniBa'abood Family Medicine Centre, Ministry of Public Health and Population, Al-Mukala, Yemen. salwaalassani@gmail.com.
Reema H Al-HaddadFowa Alqadeema Primary Care Centre, Ministry of Public Health and population, Al-Mukala, Yemen. rema20092010@yahoo.com.
Wafa H Al-ShaeebFamily Medicine Department, Hadhramout University College of Medicine, Al-Mukala, Yemen. dr.wafa.haj@hotmail.com.
Manal A Bin SelmBa'abood Family Medicine Centre, Ministry of Public Health and Population, Al-Mukala, Yemen. m.benselm@yahoo.com.
Abdulla S AlyamaniFamily Medicine Department, Hadhramout University College of Medicine, Al-Mukala, Yemen. alyamani1000@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient safety culture in primary care is the first step to achieve high quality health care. This study aims to provide a baseline assessment of patient safety culture in primary care settings in Al-Mukala, Yemen as a first published study from a least developed country.

methodsA survey was conducted in primary healthcare centres and units in Al-Mukala District, Yemen. A comprehensive sample from the available 16 centres was included. An Arabic version of the Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture was distributed to all health workers (110). Participants were physicians, nurses and administrative staff.

resultsThe response rate from the participating centres was 71 %. (N = 78). The percent positive responses of the items is equal to the percentage of participants who answered positively. Composite scores were calculated by averaging the percent positive response on the items within a dimension. Positive safety culture was defined as 60 % or more positive responses on items or dimensions. Patient safety culture was perceived to be generally positive with the exception of the dimensions of 'Communication openness', 'Work pressure and pace' and 'Patient care tracking/follow-up', as the percent positive response of these dimensions were 58, 57, and 52 % respectively. Overall, positive rating on quality and patient safety were low (49 and 46 % respectively).

conclusionsAlthough patient safety culture in Al-Mukala primary care setting is generally positive, patient safety and quality rating were fairly low. Implementation of a safety and quality management system in Al-Mukala primary care setting are paramount. Further research is needed to confirm the applicability of the Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture (MOSPSC) for Al-Mukala primary care.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleOrganizational CulturePrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesYemen

Identifiers

PMID26463229
PMCPMC4604039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.