Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26463220›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Application of two versions of the WHO/international society of hypertension absolute cardiovascular risk assessment tools in a rural Bangladeshi population.

Kaniz Fatema, Nicholas Arnold Zwar, Abul Hasnat Milton, Bayzidur Rahman, Liaquat Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaniz FatemaDepartment of Epidemiology, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences (BUHS), Dhaka, Bangladesh Faculty of Medicine, The School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicholas Arnold ZwarFaculty of Medicine, The School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abul Hasnat MiltonFaculty of Health and Medicine, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (CCEB), The School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Bayzidur RahmanFaculty of Medicine, The School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Liaquat AliDepartment of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, BUHS, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate the absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk burden in a remote rural Bangladeshi population using the 'With' and 'Without' Cholesterol versions of the WHO/International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) CVD risk assessment chart (particularly suitable for low and middle-income countries due to less reliance on laboratory testing) and to evaluate the agreement between the two approaches.

designCross-sectional study using data from a large prospective cohort of the North Bengal Non-Communicable Disease Programme (NB-NCDP) of Bangladesh.

settingGeneral rural population from Thakurgaon district of Bangladesh.

participants563 individuals who were categorised as having 'no CVDs' on screening by a questionnaire-based survey using the 'WHO CVD-Risk Management Package' developed in 2002.

main outcome measuresAbsolute CVD risk burden assessed using two versions of the WHO/ISH risk assessment charts for the South-East Asian Region-D.

results10-year risk (moderate, high and very high) positivity was present among 21.5% and 20.2% of participants, respectively, using with and without cholesterol versions of the tool. The overall concordance rate for the two versions was 89.5% and they did not differ significantly in estimating the proportion of overall participants having higher levels of CVD. The projected drug requirement, however, showed a significant overestimation in the proportion of participants at both the threshold levels (p<0.002) on using 'without' as compared to 'with' cholesterol versions.

conclusionsAbout one-fifth of the adult population in Bangladesh, even in a remote rural area, seem to be at risk of developing CVDs (25% of them at high risk and 25% at very high risk) within 10 years with males and females being almost equally vulnerable.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationSocieties, MedicalWorld Health OrganizationAdultAgedBangladeshCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentBangladeshCardiovascular diseasesCholesterolrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID26463220
PMCPMC4606419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.