ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2015
A Twitter Education: Why Psychiatrists Should Tweet.
Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Scoping Review of Physician Advocacy on Twitter.Cureus · 2023Article
- Antidepressants: A content analysis of healthcare providers' tweets.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- The relationship between the sources of confidence in overcoming COVID-19 and the improvement of medical students' professional identity: mediation by medical students' attention to COVID-19.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Areas of Interest and Social Consideration of Antidepressants on English Tweets: A Natural Language Processing Classification Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Characterizing and Identifying the Prevalence of Web-Based Misinformation Relating to Medication for Opioid Use Disorder: Machine Learning Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Twitter Users' Views on Mental Health Crisis Resolution Team Care Compared With Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups: Qualitative Analysis.JMIR mental health · 2021Article
- Use of Twitter in Neurology: Boon or Bane?Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Review
- Defining the Digital Self: A Qualitative Study to Explore the Digital Component of Professional Identity in the Health Professions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- A Collaborative Framework Based for Semantic Patients-Behavior Analysis and Highlight Topics Discovery of Alcoholic Beverages in Online Healthcare Forums.Journal of medical systems · 2020Article
- Tweetchats, Disseminating Information, and Sparking Further Scientific Discussion with Social Media.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2020Article
- Increasing Interest of Mass Communication Media and the General Public in the Distribution of Tweets About Mental Disorders: Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Observational
- How Twitter has connected the colorectal community.Techniques in coloproctology · 2016Article
- Twitter for microblogging in oral health care, research, and academics: Road map and future directions.Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFPArticle
- HARNESSING SOCIAL MEDIA FOR HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT.Electronic commerce research and applicationsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social media tools such as blogs, microblogs, social networking sites, podcasts, and video-sharing sites are now ubiquitous. These tools enable instantaneous interactions with a global community of individuals, including medical professionals, learners, and patients. An understanding of social media tools and how they can be used by psychiatrists is increasingly important. This review defines some relevant social media terms and addresses challenges specific to the use of social media in psychiatry. Focused primarily on Twitter, one of the most commonly used social media tools, the review describes how Twitter is being used in non-psychiatric medical fields and highlights four current and/or potential uses of Twitter in psychiatry: (1) patient care and advocacy, (2) lifelong learning, (3) research data collection and collaboration, and (4) scholarly recognition and impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26463050What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.