Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26463005›Full record

ArticleFEMS yeast research2015

2μ plasmid in Saccharomyces species and in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Pooja K Strope, Stanislav G Kozmin, Daniel A Skelly, Paul M Magwene, Fred S Dietrich, John H McCusker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS yeast research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deconstruction ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Core gene set of the speciesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Truth in wine yeast.Microbial biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pooja K StropeDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Stanislav G KozminDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Daniel A SkellyDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Paul M MagweneDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Fred S DietrichDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
John H McCuskerDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA mccus001@mc.duke.edu.

Funding

Tri-Institutional Molecular Mycology and Pathogenesis Training ProgramT32AI052080 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDREW ALSPAUGH, JOSEPH HEITMAN · 2003 to 2026
$8.7M
High throughput S. cerevisiae HAM, GWA & QT/QTL architectureR01GM098287 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DIETRICH, FRED S, MAGWENE, PAUL MITAARI · 2011 to 2014
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI052080-11NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We determined that extrachromosomal 2μ plasmid was present in 67 of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae 100-genome strains; in addition to variation in the size and copy number of 2μ, we identified three distinct classes of 2μ. We identified 2μ presence/absence and class associations with populations, clinical origin and nuclear genotypes. We also screened genome sequences of S. paradoxus, S. kudriavzevii, S. uvarum, S. eubayanus, S. mikatae, S. arboricolus and S. bayanus strains for both integrated and extrachromosomal 2μ. Similar to S. cerevisiae, we found no integrated 2μ sequences in any S. paradoxus strains. However, we identified part of 2μ integrated into the genomes of some S. uvarum, S. kudriavzevii, S. mikatae and S. bayanus strains, which were distinct from each other and from all extrachromosomal 2μ. We identified extrachromosomal 2μ in one S. paradoxus, one S. eubayanus, two S. bayanus and 13 S. uvarum strains. The extrachromosomal 2μ in S. paradoxus, S. eubayanus and S. cerevisiae were distinct from each other. In contrast, the extrachromosomal 2μ in S. bayanus and S. uvarum strains were identical with each other and with one of the three classes of S. cerevisiae 2μ, consistent with interspecific transfer.

Indexed as

Interspersed Repetitive SequencesPlasmidsGenetic VariationSaccharomyces2-micron plasmid2μ plasmidpopulation genomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces genusselfish genetic elements

Identifiers

PMID26463005
PMCPMC4809986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.