Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26462935›Full record

ArticleInsects2014

Intraspecific Variation in Female Sex Pheromone of the Codling Moth Cydia pomonella.

Claire Duménil, Gary J R Judd, Dolors Bosch, Mario Baldessari, César Gemeno, Astrid T Groot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claire DuménilIBED, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands. cnf.dumenil@gmail.com.
Gary J R JuddPacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Box 5000, 4200 Highway 97, Summerland, BC V0H 1Z0, Canada. Gary.Judd@agr.gc.ca.
Dolors BoschIRTA, Sustainable Plant Protection, Entomology, Avda Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain. dolors.bosch@irta.cat.
Mario BaldessariFEM, Technology Transfer Center, V. E. Mach, 1 38010 S. Michele a/A, Italy. mario.baldessari@fmach.it.
César GemenoDepartment of Crop and Forest Sciences, University of Lleida, Avda Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain. cesar.gemeno@pvcf.udl.cat.
Astrid T GrootIBED, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.t.groot@uva.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The codling moth, Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae), is a major pest of apple, pear and walnut orchards worldwide. This pest is often controlled using the biologically friendly control method known as pheromone-based mating disruption. Mating disruption likely exerts selection on the sexual communication system of codling moth, as male and female moths will persist in their attempt to meet and mate. Surprisingly little is known on the intraspecific variation of sexual communication in this species. We started an investigation to determine the level of individual variation in the female sex pheromone composition of this moth and whether variation among different populations might be correlated with use of mating disruption against those populations. By extracting pheromone glands of individual females from a laboratory population in Canada and from populations from apple orchards in Spain and Italy, we found significant between- and within-population variation. Comparing females that had been exposed to mating disruption, or not, revealed a significant difference in sex pheromone composition for two of the minor components. Overall, the intraspecific variation observed shows the potential for a shift in female sexual signal when selection pressure is high, as is the case with continuous use of mating disruption.

Indexed as

codlemonecommunication interferenceCydia pomonellaLepidopteramating disruptionpheromonesexual communicationTortricidae

Identifiers

PMID26462935
PMCPMC4592601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.