Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26462919›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2015

Novel Imaging of Prostate Cancer with MRI, MRI/US, and PET.

Phillip J Koo, Jennifer J Kwak, Sajal Pokharel, Peter L Choyke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Phillip J KooDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Mail Stop L954, 12401 E. 17th Avenue, Room 1512, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. phillip.koo@ucdenver.edu.
Jennifer J KwakDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Mail Stop L954, 12401 E. 17th Avenue, Room 1512, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. jennifer.kwak@ucdenver.edu.
Sajal PokharelDivision of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Mail Stop L954, 12401 E. 17th Avenue, Room 1512, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. sajal.pokharel@ucdenver.edu.
Peter L ChoykeCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Building 10, Room B3B69F, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1088, USA. pchoyke@nih.gov.

Funding

Prostate Cancer ImagingZIABC010655 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2025
$49.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC010655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging of prostate cancer presents many challenges to the imaging community. There has been much progress in this space in large part due to MRI and PET radiopharmaceuticals. Though MRI has been focused on the evaluation of local disease and PET on the detection of metastatic disease, these two areas do converge and will be complementary especially with the growth of new PET/MRI technologies. In this review article, we review novel MRI, MRI/US, and PET radiopharmaceuticals which will offer insight into the future direction of imaging in prostate cancer.

Indexed as

BiopsyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyRadiopharmaceuticalsAcetateBombesinDKIDWIFACBCFDHTFusionGRPHyperpolarizedMRIMRI/USPETPET/CTProstate cancerPSMA

Identifiers

PMID26462919
PMCPMC6364699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.