Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26462917›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

Development of a community health inclusion index: an evaluation tool for improving inclusion of people with disabilities in community health initiatives.

Yochai Eisenberg, James H Rimmer, Tapan Mehta, Michael H Fox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Statewide Assessment of Public Park Accessibility and Usability and Playground Safety.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Changing the Paradigm in Public Health and Disability through a Knowledge Translation Center.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yochai EisenbergInstitute on Disability and Human Development, 1640 W. Roosevelt Rd. M/C 626, Chicago, IL, 60608, USA. yeisen2@uic.edu.
James H RimmerUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham/Lakeshore Foundation Research Collaborative, 4000 Ridgeway Dr., Birmingham, 35209, AL, USA. jrimmer@uab.edu.
Tapan MehtaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham/Lakeshore Foundation Research Collaborative, 4000 Ridgeway Dr., Birmingham, 35209, AL, USA. tapan@uab.edu.
Michael H FoxDivision of Human Development and Disability, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS E88, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA. imv9@cdc.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity health initiatives often do not provide enough supports for people with disabilities to fully participate in healthy, active living opportunities. The purpose of this study was to design an instrument that focused on integrating disability-related items into a multi-level survey tool that assessed healthy, active living initiatives.

methodsThe development and testing of the Community Health Inclusion Index (CHII) involved four components: (a) literature review of studies that examined barriers and facilitators to healthy, active living; (b) focus groups with persons with disabilities and professionals living in geographically diverse settings; (c) expert panel to establish a final set of critical items; and (d) field testing the CHII in 164 sites across 15 communities in 5 states to assess the instrument's reliability.

resultsResults from initial analysis of these data indicated that the CHII has good reliability. Depending on the subscale, Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.700 to 0.965. The CHII's inter-rater agreement showed that 14 of the 15 venues for physical activity or healthy eating throughout a community had strong agreement (0.81 - 1.00), while one venue had substantial agreement (0.61 - 0.80).

conclusionThe CHII is the first instrument to operationalize community health inclusion into a comprehensive assessment tool that can be used by public health professionals and community coalitions to examine the critical supports needed for improving healthy, active living among people with disabilities.

Indexed as

Social ParticipationSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultChildCommunity Health ServicesFocus GroupsHumansMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesPublic FacilitiesReproducibility of ResultsResidence CharacteristicsSchoolsWorkplaceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26462917
PMCPMC4603756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.