Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26462751›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Regulating Biocompatibility of Carbon Spheres via Defined Nanoscale Chemistry and a Careful Selection of Surface Functionalities.

Santosh K Misra, Huei-Huei Chang, Prabuddha Mukherjee, Saumya Tiwari, Ayako Ohoka, Dipanjan Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recent advances in drug delivery and targeting to the brain.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Physiological and Pathological Factors Affecting Drug Delivery to the Brain by Nanoparticles.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Santosh K MisraBeckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Bioengineering and Materials Science and Engineering, Urbana, 61801, USA.
Huei-Huei ChangDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, 61801, USA.
Prabuddha MukherjeeBeckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Bioengineering and Materials Science and Engineering, Urbana, 61801, USA.
Saumya TiwariBeckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Bioengineering and Materials Science and Engineering, Urbana, 61801, USA.
Ayako OhokaBeckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Bioengineering and Materials Science and Engineering, Urbana, 61801, USA.
Dipanjan PanBeckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Bioengineering and Materials Science and Engineering, Urbana, 61801, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A plethora of nanoarchitectures have been evaluated preclincially for applications in early detection and treatment of diseases at molecular and cellular levels resulted in limited success of their clinical translation. It is important to identify the factors that directly or indirectly affect their use in human. We bring a fundamental understanding of how to adjust the biocompatibility of carbon based spherical nanoparticles (CNPs) through defined chemistry and a vigilant choice of surface functionalities. CNPs of various size are designed by tweaking size (2-250 nm), surface chemistries (positive, or negatively charged), molecular chemistries (linear, dendritic, hyperbranched) and the molecular weight of the coating agents (MW 400-20 kDa). A combination of in vitro assays as tools were performed to determine the critical parameters that may trigger toxicity. Results indicated that hydrodynamic sizes are potentially not a risk factor for triggering cellular and systemic toxicity, whereas the presence of a highly positive surface charge and increasing molecular weight enhance the chance of inducing complement activation. Bare and carboxyl-terminated CNPs did present some toxicity at the cellular level which, however, is not comparable to those caused by positively charged CNPs. Similarly, negatively charged CNPs with hydroxyl and carboxylic functionalities did not cause any hemolysis.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsCarbonCell SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugLethal Dose 50Molecular WeightNanospheresParticle SizeSurface PropertiesBiocompatible MaterialsCarbon

Identifiers

PMID26462751
PMCPMC4604511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.