Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26462693›Full record

ReviewInsects2014

Sexual Communication in the Drosophila Genus.

Gwénaëlle Bontonou, Claude Wicker-Thomas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Regulatory Changes in the Fatty Acid ElongasebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Using Flies to Understand Social Networks.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021
    Review
  12. Inheritance of pheromone profiles from agedmicroPublication biology · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Decoding ants' olfactory system sheds light on the evolution of social communication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  17. Triggers of the Postural Display of Courtship inJournal of insect behavior · 2017
    Article
  18. Regionalization of surface lipids in insects.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gwénaëlle BontonouCNRS UPR 9034 and Université de Paris Sud, 91198 Gif sur Yvette, France. Gwenaelle.Bontonou@legs.cnrs-gif.fr.
Claude Wicker-ThomasCNRS UPR 9034 and Université de Paris Sud, 91198 Gif sur Yvette, France. Claude.Wicker-Thomas@legs.cnrs-gif.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In insects, sexual behavior depends on chemical and non-chemical cues that might play an important role in sexual isolation. In this review, we present current knowledge about sexual behavior in the Drosophila genus. We describe courtship and signals involved in sexual communication, with a special focus on sex pheromones. We examine the role of cuticular hydrocarbons as sex pheromones, their implication in sexual isolation, and their evolution. Finally, we discuss the roles of male cuticular non-hydrocarbon pheromones that act after mating: cis-vaccenyl acetate, developing on its controversial role in courtship behavior and long-chain acetyldienylacetates and triacylglycerides, which act as anti-aphrodisiacs in mated females.

Indexed as

cis-vaccenyl acetatecourtshipDrosophilapheromones

Identifiers

PMID26462693
PMCPMC4592592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.