ArticleZhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi2015
[Hematopoietic reconstitution and prognosis of different types of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe aplastic anemia].
Article in Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the differences between hematopoietic reconstitution and longterm prognosis of patients with severe aplastic anemia （SAA） after HLA- matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation（MSD-HSCT）, Haploidentical HSCT（Haplo-HSCT）, unrelated donor allogeneic HSCT（UD-HSCT）and umbilical cord blood HSCT（UCB-HSCT）.
methodsIn this retrospective study, 63 patients with SAA who received HSCT in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between May 2008 and December 2013 were enrolled. The subjects were divided into 4 groups according to the transplantation types. The hematopoietic reconstitution, the incidence of acute graft-versushost disease（aGVHD）and 5- year survival rate after transplantation were compared.
resultsAll 53 subjects who received MSD-HSCT, Haplo-HSCT and UD-HSCT achieved hematopoietic reconstitution. Of them, the recovery of neutrophil and platelet were not significantly different（P<0.05）. Patients receiving UCB-HSCT had delayed recovery of hematopoiesis, and a significantly reduced reconstruction rate, when compared with those in the other 3 groups （P<0.01）. However, 4 patients undergoing UCB- HSCT presented with autologous hematopoiesis, a period of time after the failure of hematopoietic reconstitution. The expected 5- year survival rates after MSD- HSCT, Haplo- HSCT, UD- HSCT and UCB- HSCT were 70.0%, 81.0%, 88.9% and 77.8%, respectively（P>0.05）.
conclusionMSD-HSCT, Haplo-HSCT and UD-HSCT had no statistically significance in terms of hematopoietic reconstitution or prognosis. Although hematopoietic reconstitution of UCB-HSCT was lower than other transplantation types, but no significant difference in overall prognosis. So if HLA-matched sibling donor is not available, SAA patients can choose Haplo- HSCT, UD - HSCT or UCB- HSCT with comparable efficacy to MSD- HSCT, as an alternative therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.