Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26462588›Full record

ArticleInsects2014

Screening of Repellents against Vespid Wasps.

Jean-Luc Boevé, Kris Honraet, Bart Rossel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jean-Luc BoevéService Entomology, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Rue Vautier 29, Brussels B-1000, Belgium. jean-luc.boeve@naturalsciences.be.
Kris HonraetOystershell Laboratories, Booiebos 24, Drongen B-9031, Belgium. d@oystershell.com.
Bart RosselOystershell Laboratories, Booiebos 24, Drongen B-9031, Belgium. bart.rossel@Oystershell.com.
Oystershell (Belgium) · BEInstitute of Natural Sciences · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vespid wasps are ecologically beneficial, but they can be a nuisance and dangerous to people due to their tendency to sting. Here, the aim was to screen samples of volatiles (i.e., essential oils and pure chemicals) for their repellency against wasps. The number of wasps (mainly Vespula vulgaris) present in a glass box with attractant and 5 µL sample was compared to the number of wasps in a similar box with attractant only. Both boxes were connected to a large glass container harboring 18-35 wasps. Among 66 tested samples, some essential oils from Lamiaceae and Asteraceae, as well as some pure natural compounds such as the monoterpenes (-)-terpinen-4-ol and isopulegol showed a significant repellency against vespids. Our results corroborate the potential of (mixtures of) volatiles in repelling these insects.

Indexed as

essential oilslaboratory testingMentharepellentVespidaeVespulavolatiles

Identifiers

PMID26462588
PMCPMC4592629
OpenAlexW2044923405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.