Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26462480›Full record

Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2016

Higher response with bone mineral density increase with monthly injectable ibandronate 1 mg compared with oral risedronate in the MOVER study.

Tetsuo Nakano, Masao Yamamoto, Junko Hashimoto, Masato Tobinai, Seitaro Yoshida, Toshitaka Nakamura

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bone Mineral Density After Transitioning From Denosumab to Alendronate.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2020
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Zoledronate treatment has different effects in mouse strains with contrasting baseline bone mechanical phenotypes.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tetsuo NakanoTamana Central Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Masao YamamotoProject & Lifecycle Management Unit, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Junko HashimotoProject & Lifecycle Management Unit, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. hashimotojnk@chugai-pharm.co.jp.
Masato TobinaiClinical Development Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Seitaro YoshidaClinical Development Division, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Toshitaka NakamuraNational Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kumamoto Central Hospital · JPNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined response to bone mineral density (BMD) gains in the MOVER study following treatment with intravenous (IV) ibandronate 1 mg/month, and investigated the characteristics of a non-responder group. At 1 year, responder rates for patients with BMD increases >0 % were similar with IV ibandronate 0.5 or 1 mg/month and oral risedronate 2.5 mg/day. However, after 3 years, responder rates with BMD increases ≥3 % were highest with ibandronate 1 mg at all bone sites (>80 % at the lumbar spine [L2-L4] and >50 % at all femur sites, which was significantly higher than with risedronate). Non-responders were defined by BMD increases ≤3 % at L2-L4 or ≤0 % at total hip, and ≤50 % reduction in creatinine-corrected urinary collagen type 1 cross-linked C-telopeptide (uCTX) from baseline to 1 year. There were a small number of non-responders in the ibandronate 1 mg group: 3.3 % (10/299) with ≤0 % total hip BMD increase and ≤50 % uCTX reduction from baseline. These non-responders had lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels than responders, but no differences in kidney function, L2-L4 BMD or bone turnover marker baseline values. Throughout the study, non-responders failed to show any increases in BMD. Our analysis demonstrates significantly higher responder rates with IV ibandronate 1 mg/month than with risedronate at 3 years. A small number of non-responders in the ibandronate group had lower 25(OH)D baseline levels than responders, suggesting that 25(OH)D levels could be a useful indicator of BMD response to therapy.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAgedBone DensityCollagen Type ICreatinineDiphosphonatesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFemurHumansIbandronic AcidKidney Function TestsLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle Aged25-hydroxyvitamin DCollagen Type Icollagen type I trimeric cross-linked peptideCreatinineDiphosphonatesIbandronic AcidPeptidesRisedronic AcidVitamin DIbandronateIntravenousMOVER studyOsteoporosisResponders

Identifiers

PMID26462480
OpenAlexW1935135864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.