Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26462171›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

Effects of Reverberation and Compression on Consonant Identification in Individuals with Hearing Impairment.

Paul N Reinhart, Pamela E Souza, Nirmal K Srinivasan, Frederick J Gallun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Does the Speech Cue Profile Affect Response to Amplitude Envelope Distortion?Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul N Reinhart1Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA; 2Knowles Hearing Center, Evanston, Illinois, USA; 3National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon, USA; and 4Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Pamela E Souza
Nirmal K Srinivasan
Frederick J Gallun

Funding

Acoustic and Perceptual Effects of WDRC AmplificationR01DC006014 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SOUZA, PAMELA E. · 2005 to 2020
$3.9M
Predicting the benefits of spatial and spectrotemporal cuesR01DC011828 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GALLUN, FREDERICK J. · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC0060014NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006014NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHearing aids are frequently used in reverberant environments; however, relatively little is known about how reverberation affects the processing of signals by modern hearing-aid algorithms. The purpose of this study was to investigate the acoustic and behavioral effects of reverberation and wide-dynamic range compression (WDRC) in hearing aids on consonant identification for individuals with hearing impairment.

designTwenty-three listeners with mild to moderate sloping sensorineural hearing loss were tested monaurally under varying degrees of reverberation and WDRC conditions. Listeners identified consonants embedded within vowel-consonant-vowel nonsense syllables. Stimuli were processed to simulate a range of realistic reverberation times and WDRC release times using virtual acoustic simulations. In addition, the effects of these processing conditions were acoustically analyzed using a model of envelope distortion to examine the effects on the temporal envelope.

resultsAided consonant identification significantly decreased as reverberation time increased. Consonant identification was also significantly affected by WDRC release time. This relationship was such that individuals tended to perform significantly better with longer release times. There was no significant interaction between reverberation and WDRC. The application of the acoustic model to the processed signal showed a close relationship between trends in the behavioral performance and distortion to the temporal envelope resulting from reverberation and WDRC. The results of the acoustic model demonstrated the same trends found in the behavioral data for both reverberation and WDRC.

conclusionsReverberation and WDRC release time both affect aided consonant identification for individuals with hearing impairment, and these condition effects are associated with alterations to the temporal envelope. There was no significant interaction between reverberation and WDRC release time.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHearing AidsSpeech PerceptionAgedAged, 80 and overData CompressionFemaleHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID26462171
PMCPMC4767560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.