SynthesisOncotarget2015
Dietary fatty acids intake and endometrial cancer risk: a dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.
Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association between antidepressant medication use and epithelial ovarian cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Pooled it
- Fluoxetine and congenital malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Pooled it
- Use of acetaminophen and risk of endometrial cancer: evidence from observational studies.Oncotarget · 2017Pooled it
- Sertraline use in the first trimester and risk of congenital anomalies: a systemic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Pooled it
- Use of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors in the first trimester and risk of cardiovascular-related malformations: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.Scientific reports · 2017Pooled it
- Effect of assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Scientific reports · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Cholesterol consumption and risk of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- Parity and gastric cancer risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.Scientific reports · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Habitual Consumption of a Food Supplement Containing Miraculin in Malnourished Cancer Patients: The CLINMIR Pilot Study.Nutrients · 2024Trial
- Alterations in lipid metabolism and blood profile in gynecological cancers - potential strategies in diagnosis and treatment.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- TOMM40 Correlates with Cholesterol and is Predictive of a Favorable Prognosis in Endometrial Carcinoma.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025Article
- Fat and fatty acids - a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023.Food & nutrition research · 2024Article
- The Modulatory Effects of Fatty Acids on Cancer Progression.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Review of Mendelian Randomization Studies on Endometrial Cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
- A Narrative Review of the Role of Diet and Lifestyle Factors in the Development and Prevention of Endometrial Cancer.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epidemiological studies have provided controversial evidence of the association between dietary fatty acids intake and endometrial cancer risk. The continuous update project of World Cancer Research Fund failed to focus on this issue. To address this inconsistency, we conducted this dose-response meta-analysis based on epidemiological studies published up to the end of June 2015 identified from PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. Two authors independently performed the eligibility evaluation and data extraction. Random-effects models were used to estimate summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Fourteen epidemiological studies (4 cohort and 10 case-control studies) were included in this dose-response meta-analysis. The summary RR for an intake increment of 10g/day was 1.02 (95% CI = 0.97-1.08; I2 = 66.0%) for saturated fatty acids, 0.98 (95% CI = 0.96-1.001; I2 = 0%) for monounsaturated fatty acids, and 1.00 (95% CI = 0.95-1.06; I2 = 0%) for polyunsaturated fatty acids intake. Non-significant results were observed in the majority of subgroup analyses stratified by study characteristics and adjustment for potential confounders in analyses of aforementioned associations. In conclusion, results from this dose-response meta-analysis provided limited evidence that dietary saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fatty acids consumption was associated with endometrial cancer risk. Further studies, especial prospective designed or pooled studies are warranted to confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.