Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26462021›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

The prognostic value of peripheral CD4+CD25+ T lymphocytes among early stage and triple negative breast cancer patients receiving dendritic cells-cytokine induced killer cells infusion.

Qing-Kun Song, Jun Ren, Xin-Na Zhou, Xiao-Li Wang, Guo-Hong Song, Li-Jun Di, Jing Yu, Amy Hobeika, Michael A Morse, Yan-Hua Yuan and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Qing-Kun SongBeijing Key Laboratory of Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Capital Medical University Cancer Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Beijing 10038, China.
Jun RenBeijing Key Laboratory of Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Capital Medical University Cancer Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Beijing 10038, China.
Xin-Na ZhouBeijing Key Laboratory of Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Capital Medical University Cancer Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Beijing 10038, China.
Xiao-Li WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Capital Medical University Cancer Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Beijing 10038, China.
Guo-Hong SongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Li-Jun DiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Jing YuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Amy HobeikaDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America.
Michael A MorseDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America.
Yan-Hua YuanBeijing Key Laboratory of Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Capital Medical University Cancer Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Beijing 10038, China.
Hua-Bing YangBeijing Key Laboratory of Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Capital Medical University Cancer Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Beijing 10038, China.
Herbert Kim LyerlyDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America.
Beijing Shijitan Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNDuke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · USPeking University · CNPeking University Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the prognostic value of CD4+CD25+ T lymphocyte in peripheral blood among breast cancer patients treated with adoptive T lymphocytes immunotherapy.

methods217 patients participated in the follow-up study. CD4+CD25+ proportion was measured by flow cytometry in peripheral T cells. The median survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curve, Log-rank test and Cox hazard proportion regression model, between groups of CD4+CD25+ proportion more than 5% and less than or equal to 5% in peripheral T cells.

resultsPeripheral CD4+CD25+ T lymphocytes had not a relationship with progression-free survival. It was featured that above 5% peripheral CD4+CD25+ proportion of T cells was related with the median overall survival by a shorten of 51 months (p < 0.05) with the HR 1.65 (95%CI 1.04, 2.62). Above 5% CD4+CD25+proportion of T cells produced the HR to be 1.76 (95%CI 1.07, 2.87) In stage 0-II patients, and 3.59 (95%CI 1.05, 12.29) in triple negative breast cancer patients.

conclusionsCellular immunity restoration recovered by adoptive T cell infusions which resulted in less proportion of peripheral CD4+CD25+T lymphocytes could be a potential prognostic indicator among early stage and triple negative patients.

Indexed as

AdultCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCytokine-Induced Killer CellsDendritic CellsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveInterleukin-2 Receptor alpha SubunitKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm StagingOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsInterleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunitadoptive cell therapyCD4+CD25+ T lymphocyteearly stage breast cancerprognosistriple negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID26462021
PMCPMC4747410
OpenAlexW2189309587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.