Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26461884›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Anatomy and Cytogenetic Identification of a Wheat-Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng Line with Early Maturation.

Liangming Wang, Yang Liu, Wanli Du, Fan Jing, Zhonghua Wang, Jun Wu, Xinhong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Wheat-Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Integrated review ofMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Cytogenetic and Molecular Marker Analyses of a Novel Wheat-International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Identification of a Wheat-Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liangming WangShaanxi Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering Breeding, College of Agronomy, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Yang LiuShaanxi Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering Breeding, College of Agronomy, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Wanli DuShaanxi Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering Breeding, College of Agronomy, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Fan JingShaanxi Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering Breeding, College of Agronomy, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Zhonghua WangShaanxi Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering Breeding, College of Agronomy, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Jun WuShaanxi Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering Breeding, College of Agronomy, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Xinhong ChenShaanxi Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering Breeding, College of Agronomy, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In previous studies, our research team successfully transferred the Ns genome from Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng into Triticum aestivum (common wheat cv. 7182) using embryo culture. In the present study, one of these lines, i.e., hybrid progeny 25-10-3, which matured about 10-14 days earlier than its wheat parent, was assessed using sequenced characterized amplified region (SCAR) analysis, EST-SSR and EST-STS molecular markers, and genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). We found that this was a stable wheat-P. huashanica disomic addition line (2n = 44 = 22 II) and the results demonstrated that it was a 6Ns disomic chromosome addition line, but it exhibited many different features compared with previously characterized lines, i.e., a longer awn, early maturation, and no twin spikelets. It was considered to be an early-maturing variety based on the early stage of inflorescence initiation in field experiments and binocular microscope observations over three consecutive years. This characteristic was distinct, especially from the single ridge stage and double ridge stage until the glume stage. In addition, it had a higher photosynthesis rate and economic values than common wheat cv. 7182, i.e., more spikelets per spike, more florets per spikelet, more kernels per spike, and a higher thousand-grain weight. These results suggest that this material may comprise a genetic pool of beneficial genes or chromosome segments, which are suitable for introgression to improve the quality of common wheat.

Indexed as

Cytogenetic AnalysisChromosomes, PlantExpressed Sequence TagsMicrosatellite RepeatsPhotosynthesisSeedsTriticum

Identifiers

PMID26461884
PMCPMC4604206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.