Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26461463›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical pharmacology2016

Pharmacokinetics of metoprolol during pregnancy and lactation.

Rachel J Ryu, Sara Eyal, Thomas R Easterling, Steve N Caritis, Raman Venkataraman, Gary Hankins, Erik Rytting, Kenneth Thummel, Edward J Kelly, Linda Risler and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Mechanisms of altered hepatic drug disposition during pregnancy: small molecules.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2025
    Review
  7. Beta-blockers and breastfeeding: a real-life prospective study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Sources of Interindividual Variability.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachel J RyuDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sara EyalInstitute for Drug Research, School of Pharmacy, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Thomas R EasterlingDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Steve N CaritisDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Raman VenkataramanSchool of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Gary HankinsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Erik RyttingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Kenneth ThummelDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Edward J KellyDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Linda RislerDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brian PhillipsDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Matthew T HonakerDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Danny D ShenDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mary F HebertDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USJerusalem Institute for Israel Studies · IL

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE: BPCAUL1RR024153 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2006 to 2011
$73.9M
Institute of Translational Health SciencesUL1TR000423 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$49.4M
XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ALI SHOJAIE · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
Pregnancy and Drug Metabolizing Enzymes and TransportersU10HD047905 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI CARITIS, STEVE N · 2004 to 2014
$9.7M
UW Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research UnitU10HD047892 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EASTERLING, THOMAS R, HEBERT, MARY F · 2004 to 2014
$9.4M
Obstetric Pharmacology Research Units Network Center at UTMB-GalvestonU10HD047891 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI AHMED, MAHMOUD S, HANKINS, GARY D · 2004 to 2014
$9.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000423NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000423NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024153NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024153NICHD NIH HHS 5U10HD047891-10NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD047891NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD047892NICHD NIH HHS U10HD047892NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD047905NICHD NIH HHS U10HD047905NIEHS NIH HHS 30ES007033NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics of metoprolol during pregnancy and lactation. Serial plasma, urine, and breast milk concentrations of metoprolol and its metabolite, α-hydroxymetoprolol, were measured over 1 dosing interval in women treated with metoprolol (25-750 mg/day) during early pregnancy (n = 4), mid-pregnancy (n = 14), and late pregnancy (n = 15), as well as postpartum (n = 9) with (n = 4) and without (n = 5) lactation. Subjects were genotyped for CYP2D6 loss-of-function allelic variants. Using paired analysis, mean metoprolol apparent oral clearance was significantly higher in mid-pregnancy (361 ± 223 L/h, n = 5, P < .05) and late pregnancy (568 ± 273 L/h, n = 8, P < .05) compared with ≥3 months postpartum (200 ± 131 and 192 ± 98 L/h, respectively). When the comparison was limited to extensive metabolizers (EMs), metoprolol apparent oral clearance was significantly higher during both mid- and late pregnancy (P < .05). Relative infant exposure to metoprolol through breast milk was <1.0% of maternal weight-adjusted dose (n = 3). Because of the large, pregnancy-induced changes in metoprolol pharmacokinetics, if inadequate clinical responses are encountered, clinicians who prescribe metoprolol during pregnancy should be prepared to make aggressive changes in dosage (dose and frequency) or consider using an alternate beta-blocker.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Delayed-Action PreparationsFemaleGenotypeHumansLactationMetoprololMilk, HumanPostpartum PeriodPregnancyYoung AdultAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Delayed-Action PreparationsMetoprololbreast milkCYP2D6hypertensionmetoprololpharmacokineticspregnancy

Identifiers

PMID26461463
PMCPMC5564514
OpenAlexW1614902947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.