Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26460974›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The Sub-Cellular Localization of WRAP53 Has Prognostic Impact in Breast Cancer.

Laxmi Silwal-Pandit, Hege Russnes, Elin Borgen, Veronica Skarpeteig, Hans Kristian Moen Vollan, Ellen Schlichting, Rolf Kåresen, Bjørn Naume, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale, Marianne Farnebo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The Role of WRAP53 in Cell Homeostasis and Carcinogenesis Onset.Current issues in molecular biology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laxmi Silwal-PanditDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Radiumhospitalet-Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway.
Hege RussnesDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Radiumhospitalet-Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; Department of Pathology, Division of Diagnostics and Intervention, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway.
Elin BorgenDepartment of Pathology, Division of Diagnostics and Intervention, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway.
Veronica SkarpeteigDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Radiumhospitalet-Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Hans Kristian Moen VollanDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Radiumhospitalet-Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway.
Ellen SchlichtingDepartment of Breast- and Endocrine Surgery, Division of Surgery, Cancer and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway.
Rolf KåresenK.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway; Department of Breast- and Endocrine Surgery, Division of Surgery, Cancer and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn NaumeDepartment of Oncology, Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway.
Anne-Lise Børresen-DaleDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Radiumhospitalet-Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway.
Marianne FarneboDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Cancer Center Karolinska (CCK), Karolinska Institutet, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
Anita LangerødDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Radiumhospitalet-Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

WRAP53 protein controls intracellular trafficking of DNA repair proteins, the telomerase enzyme, and splicing factors. Functional loss of the protein has been linked to carcinogenesis, premature aging and neurodegeneration. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of WRAP53 protein expression in breast cancer. A tissue microarray was constructed from primary breast tumors and immunostained by a polyclonal WRAP53 antibody to assess the protein expression pattern. Two different patient cohorts with long term follow-up were studied; a test- and a validation set of 154 and 668 breast tumor samples respectively. Breast cancer patients with tumor cells lacking the expression of WRAP53 in the nucleus had a significantly poorer outcome compared to patients with tumor cells expressing this protein in the nuclei (HR = 1.95, 95%CI = 1.09-3.51, p = 0.025). Nuclear localization of WRAP53 was further shown to be an independent marker of prognosis in multivariate analysis (HR = 2.57, 95%CI = 1.27-5.19, p = 0.008), and also significantly associated with better outcome in patients with TP53 mutation. Here we show that the sub-cellular localization of the WRAP53 protein has a significant impact on breast cancer survival, and thus has a potential as a clinical marker in diagnostics and treatment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCell NucleusFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMolecular ChaperonesMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProtein TransportSubcellular FractionsTelomeraseMolecular ChaperonesTelomeraseWRAP53 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26460974
PMCPMC4603798
OpenAlexW2076627833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.