Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26460893›Full record

Trial reportPsychological assessment2016

Does the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire measure what we think it does? Construct validity evidence from an active controlled randomized clinical trial.

Simon B Goldberg, Joseph Wielgosz, Cortland Dahl, Brianna Schuyler, Donal S MacCoon, Melissa Rosenkranz, Antoine Lutz, Chad A Sebranek, Richard J Davidson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychological assessment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. A randomized controlled trial of a 14-day mindfulness ecological momentary intervention (MEMI) for generalized anxiety disorder.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Simon B GoldbergCenter for Investigating Healthy Minds at Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.ORCID 0000-0002-6888-0126
Joseph WielgoszCenter for Investigating Healthy Minds at Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Cortland DahlCenter for Investigating Healthy Minds at Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Brianna SchuylerCenter for Investigating Healthy Minds at Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Donal S MacCoonCenter for Investigating Healthy Minds at Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Melissa RosenkranzCenter for Investigating Healthy Minds at Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Antoine LutzCenter for Investigating Healthy Minds at Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Chad A SebranekCenter for Investigating Healthy Minds at Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Richard J DavidsonCenter for Investigating Healthy Minds at Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Funding

Wisconsin Center for the Neuroscience and Psychophysiology of MeditationP01AT004952 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DAVIDSON, RICHARD J · 2008 to 2018
$14.7M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN EMOTION RESEARCHT32MH018931 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Richard J Davidson · 1989 to 2026
$11.6M
NEUROSCIENCE TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007507 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HALLORAN, MARY C · 1985 to 2017
$9.3M
NCCIH NIH HHS P01 AT004952NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007507NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study attempted a rigorous test of the construct validity of a widely used self-report measure of dispositional mindfulness, the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), within the context of an active controlled randomized trial (n = 130). The trial included three arms: mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), an active control condition that did not include instruction in mindfulness meditation (Health Enhancement Program [HEP]), and a waitlist control condition. Partial evidence for the convergent validity of the FFMQ was shown in correlations at baseline between FFMQ facets and measures of psychological symptoms and psychological well-being. In addition, facets of the FFMQ were shown to increase over the course of an MBSR intervention relative to a waitlist control condition. However, the FFMQ failed to show discriminant validity. Specifically, facets of the FFMQ were shown to increase over the course of the HEP intervention relative to the waitlist control condition. MBSR and HEP, in contrast, did not differ in changes in FFMQ score over time. Implications of these findings for the measurement and theory of mindfulness and MBSR are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Mental HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMeditationMiddle AgedMindfulnessReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID26460893
PMCPMC4829487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.