Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26460025›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

DNA capture reveals transoceanic gene flow in endangered river sharks.

Chenhong Li, Shannon Corrigan, Lei Yang, Nicolas Straube, Mark Harris, Michael Hofreiter, William T White, Gavin J P Naylor

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Chenhong LiKey Laboratory of Exploration and Utilization of Aquatic Genetic Resources, Shanghai Ocean University, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201306, China; Hollings Marine Laboratory, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29412;
Shannon CorriganHollings Marine Laboratory, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29412;
Lei YangHollings Marine Laboratory, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29412;
Nicolas StraubeHollings Marine Laboratory, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29412;
Mark HarrisFlorida Fisheries Consultants Elasmobranch Studies, New Port Richey, FL 34655;
Michael HofreiterInstitute of Biochemistry and Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany;
William T WhiteWealth from Oceans Flagship, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Marine and Atmospheric Research, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.
Gavin J P NaylorHollings Marine Laboratory, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29412; naylorg@cofc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8731-2626
College of Charleston · USCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere · AURoffer’s Ocean Fishing Forecasting Service · USUniversity of Potsdam · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For over a hundred years, the "river sharks" of the genus Glyphis were only known from the type specimens of species that had been collected in the 19th century. They were widely considered extinct until populations of Glyphis-like sharks were rediscovered in remote regions of Borneo and Northern Australia at the end of the 20th century. However, the genetic affinities between the newly discovered Glyphis-like populations and the poorly preserved, original museum-type specimens have never been established. Here, we present the first (to our knowledge) fully resolved, complete phylogeny of Glyphis that includes both archival-type specimens and modern material. We used a sensitive DNA hybridization capture method to obtain complete mitochondrial genomes from all of our samples and show that three of the five described river shark species are probably conspecific and widely distributed in Southeast Asia. Furthermore we show that there has been recent gene flow between locations that are separated by large oceanic expanses. Our data strongly suggest marine dispersal in these species, overturning the widely held notion that river sharks are restricted to freshwater. It seems that species in the genus Glyphis are euryhaline with an ecology similar to the bull shark, in which adult individuals live in the ocean while the young grow up in river habitats with reduced predation pressure. Finally, we discovered a previously unidentified species within the genus Glyphis that is deeply divergent from all other lineages, underscoring the current lack of knowledge about the biodiversity and ecology of these mysterious sharks.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionEndangered SpeciesPhylogenyRiversSalinityAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsAsiaBase SequenceDNA, MitochondrialGene FlowLikelihood FunctionsModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataNorthern TerritorySequence Analysis, DNADNA, MitochondrialDNAfreshwater sharksmuseum specimens

Identifiers

PMID26460025
PMCPMC4629339
OpenAlexW2131554382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.