Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26459779›Full record

SynthesisAsian journal of andrology

The prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yi Huang, Hai Huang, Xiu-Wu Pan, Dan-Feng Xu, Xin-Gang Cui, Jie Chen, Yi Hong, Yi Gao, Lei Yin, Jian-Qing Ye and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Asian journal of andrology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yi HuangDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Hai HuangDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Xiu-Wu PanDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Dan-Feng XuUrology Research Center of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Xin-Gang CuiDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Jie ChenDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Yi HongDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Yi GaoDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Lei YinDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Jian-Qing YeDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
Lin LiDepartment of Urinary Surgery of Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To systematically evaluate the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in radical prostatectomy (RP) by a meta-analysis based on the published literature. To identify relevant studies, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database were searched from 1966 to May 2014. Finally, 25 studies (9503 patients) were included. LVI was found in 12.2% (1156/9503) of the RP specimens. LVI was found to be correlated with higher pathological tumor stages (greater than pT3 stage) (risk ratio [RR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73-2.08, P< 0.00001), higher Gleason scores (greater than GS = 7) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.23-1.38, P< 0.00001), positive pathological node (pN) status (RR 5.67, 95% CI 3.14-10.24, P< 0.00001), extracapsular extension (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.46-2.02, P< 0.00001), and seminal vesicle involvement (RR 3.36, 95% CI 2.41-4.70, P< 0.00001). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) was statistically significant for Biochemical Recurrence-Free (BCR-free) probability (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.64-2.56; Z = 6.30, P< 0.00001). Sensitivity analysis showed that the pooled HR and 95% CI were not significantly altered by the omission of any single study. Begg's Funnel plots showed no significant publication bias (P = 0.112). In conclusion, LVI exhibited a detrimental effect on the BCR-Free probability and clinicopathological features in RP specimens, and may prove to be an independent prognostic factor of BCR.

Indexed as

HumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisProstatectomyProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26459779
PMCPMC5000804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.