Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26459663›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical biology2016

The roles of CDR1, CDR2, and MDR1 in kaempferol-induced suppression with fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans.

Jing Shao, MengXiang Zhang, TianMing Wang, Yue Li, ChangZhong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Effect of new methionine-based ionic liquid on theIranian journal of microbiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Flavonoid-Rich Fractions ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Emerging Antifungal Targets and Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing Shaoa Laboratory of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Chinese and Western Integrative Medicine , Anhui University of Chinese Medicine , Hefei , China .
MengXiang Zhanga Laboratory of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Chinese and Western Integrative Medicine , Anhui University of Chinese Medicine , Hefei , China .
TianMing Wangb Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Chinese and Western Integrative Medicine , Anhui University of Chinese Medicine , Hefei , China , and.
Yue Lic Gynecology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Clinical College of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Anhui University of Chinese Medicine , Hefei , China.
ChangZhong Wanga Laboratory of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Chinese and Western Integrative Medicine , Anhui University of Chinese Medicine , Hefei , China .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextFungal infections caused by fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans are an intractable clinical problem, calling for new efficient antifungal drugs. Kaempferol, an active flavonoid, has been considered a potential candidate against Candida species.

objectiveThis work investigates the resistance reversion of kaempferol in fluconazole-resistant C. albicans and the underlying mechanism. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe antifungal activities of fluconazole and/or kaempferol were assessed by a series of standard procedures including broth microdilution method, checkerboard assay and time-kill (T-K) test in nine clinical strains as well as a standard reference isolate of C. albicans. Subsequently, the morphological changes, the efflux of rhodamine 6G, and the expressions of CDR 1, CDR 2, and MDR 1 were analysed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), inverted fluorescence microscope and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in C. albicans z2003.

resultsFor all the tested C. albicans strains, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of fluconazole and kaempferol ranged 0.25-32 and 128-256 μg/mL with a range of fractional inhibitory concentration index of 0.257-0.531. In C. albicans z2003, the expression of both CDR 1 and CDR 2 were decreased after exposure to kaempferol alone with negligible rhodamine 6G accumulation, while the expression of CDR 1, CDR 2 and MDR 1 were all decreased when fluconazole and kaempferol were used concomitantly with notable fluorescence of rhodamine 6G observed. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionKaempferol-induced reversion in fluconazole-resistant C. albicans might be likely due to the suppression of the expression of CDR1, CDR2 and MDR1.

Indexed as

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Candida albicansDrug Resistance, FungalDrug SynergismFluconazoleFungal ProteinsGene ExpressionKaempferolsMembrane Transport ProteinsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1CDR1 protein, Candida albicansFluconazoleFungal ProteinskaempferolKaempferolsMembrane Transport ProteinsEfflux pumpfluconazole resistancegene expressionrhodamine 6Gsynergism

Identifiers

PMID26459663
PMCPMC11132302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.