ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2015
[Immunosuppression and its use in kidney transplantation].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent immunosuppressive protocols effectively prevent acute rejection of renal allografts. Extensive drug toxicity and the deleterious effects of long-term immunosuppression are associated with significant morbidity and mortality.
objectivesThe purpose of this article is to provide an overview over modern immunosuppressants and their unwanted side effects and to discuss strategies for improved long-term transplant survival.
methodsReview of the current topic-related literature and discussion of our own experience.
resultsThe use of antibody induction together with an initial combination therapy of calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate and steroids is recommended and results in excellent early outcomes. Detrimental effects include an increased incidence of infections, malignomas, and cardiovascular diseases. Long-term transplant survival is impaired by extensive drug toxicity and the frequent development of donor specific antibodies. Reduction of overall cumulative exposure to immunosuppressants or the reduction of specific toxic drugs such as calcineurin inhibitors and steroids may improve long-term results. Alternative immunosuppressants like mTOR inhibitors and belatacept appear to be effective and safe but their long-term effects on patient and allograft survival needs to be established in clinical trials.
conclusionsCurrent immunosuppressants provide effective protection from renal allograft rejection. However, their use is complicated by serious side effects. In the future, development of novel immunosuppressants and optimization of minimization strategies may help to improve long-term success after kidney transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.