Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26459432›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2015

Validation of the NASA-TLX Score in Ongoing Assessment of Mental Workload During a Laparoscopic Learning Curve in Bariatric Surgery.

Juan Francisco Ruiz-Rabelo, Elena Navarro-Rodriguez, Leandro Luigi Di-Stasi, Nelida Diaz-Jimenez, Juan Cabrera-Bermon, Carlos Diaz-Iglesias, Manuel Gomez-Alvarez, Javier Briceño-Delgado

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. RoCS: Robotic Curriculum for young Surgeons.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juan Francisco Ruiz-RabeloGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Avda. Menendez Pidal SN, CP:14004, Córdoba, Spain. ruizrabelo@aecirujanos.es.
Elena Navarro-RodriguezGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Avda. Menendez Pidal SN, CP:14004, Córdoba, Spain. helenanr1@hotmail.com.
Leandro Luigi Di-StasiCognitive Ergonomics Group, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, C/ Campus de la Cartuja SN, CP:18075, Granada, Spain. leandro.distasi@gmail.com.
Nelida Diaz-JimenezGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Avda. Menendez Pidal SN, CP:14004, Córdoba, Spain. nelida.diaz.jimenez@gmail.com.
Juan Cabrera-BermonGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Avda. Menendez Pidal SN, CP:14004, Córdoba, Spain. juancabrerabermon@gmail.com.
Carlos Diaz-IglesiasGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Avda. Menendez Pidal SN, CP:14004, Córdoba, Spain. cjdi@hotmail.com.
Manuel Gomez-AlvarezGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Avda. Menendez Pidal SN, CP:14004, Córdoba, Spain. gomezalv@hotmail.com.
Javier Briceño-DelgadoGeneral and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Avda. Menendez Pidal SN, CP:14004, Córdoba, Spain. javibriceno@hotmail.com.
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía · ESUniversidad de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFatigue and mental workload are directly associated with high-complexity tasks. In general, difficult tasks produce a higher mental workload, leaving little opportunity to deal with new/unexpected events and increasing the likelihood of performance errors. The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) learning curve is considered to be one of the most difficult to complete in laparoscopic surgery. We wished to validate the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) in LRYGB and identify factors that could provoke a higher mental workload for surgeons during the learning curve.

methodsA single surgeon was enrolled to undertake 70 consecutive LRYGB procedures with two internal surgeons mentoring the first 35 cases. Patients were consecutive and ranked from case 35 to case 105 according to the date of the surgical procedure ("case rank"). Self-ratings of satisfaction, performance, and fatigue were measured at the end of surgery using a validated NASA-TLX questionnaire. The procedure was recorded for later viewing by two external evaluators. General data for patients and surgical variables were collected prospectively.

resultsA moderate correlation between the NASA-TLX score, BMI, operative time, and volumes of blood drainage was observed. There was no correlation between the NASA-TLX score and duration of hospital stay or time of drain removal. BMI ≥50 kg/m(2), male sex, inexperienced first assistant, and type 2 diabetes mellitus were identified as independent predictive factors of a higher NASA-TLX score.

conclusionsThe NASA-TLX is a valid tool to gauge mental workload in LRYGB.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyLearning CurveWorkloadAdultAttentionBariatric SurgeryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeYoung AdultBariatric surgeryLaparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypassLearning curveMental workloadNASA-TLX

Identifiers

PMID26459432
OpenAlexW1893147610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.