Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26459412›Full record

Observational studyBMC emergency medicine2015

Reliability and validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in an emergency department in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional observational study.

Zohair A Al Aseri, M Owais Suriya, Hosam A Hassan, Mujtaba Hasan, Shaffi Ahmed Sheikh, Adel Al Tamimi, Mashhoor Alshathri, Najeeb Khalid

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zohair A Al AseriDepartment of Emergency Medicine (65), College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital KSU, PO Box No: 7805, Riyadh, 11472, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. zalaseri@ksu.edu.sa.
M Owais SuriyaFellow Community Health, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 107, Wiggins Road, S7N 5E5, Saskatoon, Canada. muo110@mail.usask.ca.
Hosam A HassanDepartment of Emergency Medicine (65), College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital KSU, PO Box No: 7805, Riyadh, 11472, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. hoshos_630@yahoo.com.
Mujtaba HasanDepartment of Emergency Medicine (65), College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital KSU, PO Box No: 7805, Riyadh, 11472, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. mujidr@gmail.com.
Shaffi Ahmed SheikhDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine King Khalid University Hospital KSU, PO Box 230155, Riyadh, 11321, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. shaffiahamed786@gmail.com.
Adel Al TamimiDepartment of Emergency Medicine (65), College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital KSU, PO Box No: 7805, Riyadh, 11472, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. aaltammimi@ksu.edu.sa.
Mashhoor AlshathriDepartment of Emergency Medicine (65), College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital KSU, PO Box No: 7805, Riyadh, 11472, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. malshathri@ksu.edu.sa.
Najeeb KhalidCardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK. najeeb12@sky.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression and anxiety are prevalent psychiatric comorbidities that are known to have a negative impact on a patient's general prognosis. But screening for these potential comorbidities in a hospital's accident and emergency department has seldom been undertaken, particularly in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere in the Middle East. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) has been extensively used to evaluate these psychiatric comorbidities in various clinical settings at all levels of health care services except for the accident and emergency department. This study therefore aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the HADS for anxiety and depression among patients at a hospital accident and emergency department in Saudi Arabia.

methodsThis cross-sectional observational study was conducted from January to December 2012. The participants were 257 adult patients (aged 16 years and above) who presented at the accident and emergency department of King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, who met our inclusion criteria. We used an Arabic translation of the HADS. We employed factor analysis to determine the underlying factor structure of that instrument in assessing reliability and validity.

resultsWe found the Arabic version of the HADS to be acceptable for 95% of the subjects. We used Cronbach's alpha coefficient to evaluate reliability, and it indicated a significant correlation with both the anxiety (0.73) and depression (0.77) subscales of the HADS, thereby supporting the validity of the instrument. By means of factor analysis, we obtained a two-factor solution according to the two HADS subscales (anxiety and depression), and we observed a statistically significant correlation (r = 0.57; p < 0.0001) between the two subscales.

conclusionThe HADS can be used effectively in an accident and emergency department as an initial screening instrument for anxiety and depression. It thus has great potential as part of integrated multidisciplinary care.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID26459412
PMCPMC4603646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.