Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26459358›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2015

The orthotic and therapeutic effects following daily community applied functional electrical stimulation in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy: a randomised controlled trial.

Dayna Pool, Jane Valentine, Natasha Bear, Cyril J Donnelly, Catherine Elliott, Katherine Stannage

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dayna PoolDepartment of Physiotherapy and Paediatric Rehabilitation, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Roberts Road, Subiaco, 6008, Australia. Dayna.Pool@health.wa.gov.au.
Jane ValentineDepartment of Paediatric Rehabilitation, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Roberts Road, Subiaco, 6008, Australia. Jane.Valentine@health.wa.gov.au.
Natasha BearDepartment of Physiotherapy and Paediatric Rehabilitation, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Roberts Road, Subiaco, 6008, Australia. Natasha.Bear@health.wa.gov.au.
Cyril J DonnellySchool of Sport Science Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Australia. Cyril.Donnelly@uwa.edu.au.
Catherine ElliottDepartment of Paediatric Rehabilitation, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Roberts Road, Subiaco, 6008, Australia. Catherine.Elliott@health.wa.gov.au.
Katherine StannageDepartment of Orthopaedics, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Roberts Road, Subiaco, 6008, Australia. Katherine.Stannage@health.wa.gov.au.
Princess Margaret Hospital for Children · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUCurtin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the orthotic and therapeutic effects of daily community applied FES to the ankle dorsiflexors in a randomized controlled trial. We hypothesized that children receiving the eight-week FES treatment would demonstrate orthotic and therapeutic effects in gait and spasticity as well as better community mobility and balance skills compared to controls not receiving FES.

methodsThis randomized controlled trial involved 32 children (mean age 10 yrs 3 mo, SD 3 yrs 3 mo; 15 females, 17 males) with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy and a Gross Motor Function Classification System of I or II randomly assigned to a FES treatment group (n = 16) or control group (n = 16). The treatment group received eight weeks of daily FES (four hours per day, six days per week) and the control group received usual orthotic and therapy treatment. Children were assessed at baseline, post FES treatment (eight weeks) and follow-up (six weeks after post FES treatment). Outcome measures included lower limb gait mechanics, clinical measures of gastrocnemius spasticity and community mobility balance skills.

resultsParticipants used the FES for a mean daily use of 6.2 (SD 3.2) hours over the eight-week intervention period. With FES, the treatment group demonstrated a significant (p < 0.05) increase in initial contact ankle angle (mean difference 11.9° 95% CI 6.8° to 17.1°), maximum dorsiflexion ankle angle in swing (mean difference 8.1° 95% CI 1.8° to 14.4°) normalized time in stance (mean difference 0.27 95% CI 0.05 to 0.49) and normalized step length (mean difference 0.06 95% CI 0.003 to 0.126) post treatment compared to the control group. Without FES, the treatment group significantly increased community mobility balance scores at post treatment (mean difference 8.3 units 95% CI 3.2 to 13.4 units) and at follow-up (mean difference 8.9 units 95% CI 3.8 to 13.9 units) compared to the control group. The treatment group also had significantly reduced gastrocnemius spasticity at post treatment (p = 0.038) and at follow-up (dynamic range of motion mean difference 6.9°, 95% CI 0.4° to 13.6°; p = 0.035) compared to the control group.

conclusionThis study documents an orthotic effect with improvement in lower limb mechanics during gait. Therapeutic effects i.e. without FES were observed in clinical measures of gastrocnemius spasticity, community mobility and balance skills in the treatment group at post treatment and follow-up. This study supports the use of FES applied during daily walking activities to improve gait mechanics as well as to address community mobility issues among children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Register ACTRN12614000949684 . Registered 4 September 2014.

Indexed as

Orthotic DevicesAnkle JointCerebral PalsyChildElectric Stimulation TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGaitHumansMaleMotor ActivityRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26459358
PMCPMC4603297
OpenAlexW1951506913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.