Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26459289›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2015

Factors affecting milk cortisol in mid lactating dairy cows.

Sandy Sgorlon, Marta Fanzago, Denis Guiatti, Gianfranco Gabai, Giuseppe Stradaioli, Bruno Stefanon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Regulatory Role of microRNA of Milk Exosomes in Mastitis of Dairy Cows.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. MicroRNA Milk Exosomes: From Cellular Regulator to Genomic Marker.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sandy SgorlonDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali, Università di Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100, Udine, Italy. sandy.sgorlon@uniud.it.
Marta FanzagoDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali, Università di Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100, Udine, Italy. martafanz@libero.it.
Denis GuiattiDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali, Università di Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100, Udine, Italy. denis.guiatti@uniud.it.
Gianfranco GabaiDipartimento di Biomedicina Comparata ed alimentazione, Università di Padova, viale dell'Università 16, 35020, Legnaro, Italy. gianfranco.gabai@unipd.it.
Giuseppe StradaioliDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali, Università di Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100, Udine, Italy. giuseppe.stradaioli@uniud.it.
Bruno StefanonDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali, Università di Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100, Udine, Italy. bruno.stefanon@uniud.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhether the measurement of cortisol in dairy cows can be used as a biomarker of adverse environmental or pathophysiological conditions is still under of scientific debate. In these situations, several systems mainly the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, the autonomic nervous system, and the immune system are recruited to reestablish homeostasis. A first aim of the present study was to compare milk and blood cortisol concentrations and to consider its variability in milk in relation to farm, milk yield and days in milk. A second study investigates the effects of breed, class of somatic cell count (SCC) and farm on milk cortisol levels in a larger number of cows and farms, with the aim to validate the results obtained in the pilot study.

methodsFor study 1, 135 cows were sampled from 2 Italian Simmental and 2 Italian Holstein commercial farms, whilst in the second study, 542 cows were sampled from 6 commercial farms of Italian Simmental and 499 cows from 4 commercial farms of Italian Holstein.

resultsIn study 1, the values of cortisol content in milk were significantly higher in Holstein than Simmental cows. Significant differences between farms were observed for milk and plasma cortisol concentrations. Cortisol content in milk was not correlated to plasma content in study 1 and the mean milk to plasma cortisol ratio was about 1:30. In study 2, for Holstein cows, significantly higher values of milk cortisol in comparison to Simmental cows was reported. A significant effect of class of SCC was observed, cows belonging to class 3 (SCC higher than 400.000/ml) showed the highest mean values of milk cortisol. The farm effect was significant also in the study 2, confirming the results obtained in the first study.

conclusionsMilk can be considered a preferential site of sampling in dairy cows to point out short term stimulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Further studies are needed to investigate the physiological basis of the relationship between milk cortisol content and breed, milk yield and SCC to ascertain the relevance of milk cortisol to monitor the healthy status of mammary gland.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleDairyingFemaleHydrocortisoneLactationMastitis, BovineMilkHydrocortisone

Identifiers

PMID26459289
PMCPMC4603817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.