ArticleBMC medicine2015
Extending the elderly- and risk-group programme of vaccination against seasonal influenza in England and Wales: a cost-effectiveness study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of Health State Utility Values in Cost-Utility Analyses of Selected Infectious Diseases in Aging Populations: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2026Pooled it
- Optimizing influenza prevention: a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of pediatric vaccination programs and vaccine types.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Methods of assessing value for money of UK-based early childhood public health interventions: a systematic literature review.British medical bulletin · 2023Pooled it
- The cost-effectiveness of an adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine in the United Kingdom.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness of vaccines for the prevention of seasonal influenza in different age groups: a systematic reviewRevista espanola de salud publica · 2018Pooled it
- A systematic review of economic evaluations of seasonal influenza vaccination for the elderly population in the European Union.BMJ open · 2017Pooled it
- Contact With Young Children Increases the Risk of Respiratory Infection in Older Adults in Europe-the RESCEU Study.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2022Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the High-Dose Trivalent Influenza Vaccine in the Elderly Population in Italy.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
- Exploring the impact of changing government policy on vaccination eligibility for 50-64 year olds: A qualitative thematic analysis in England and Scotland.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Expanding Influenza Vaccination to Adults Aged 50 and Over in France.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2025Article
- Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Adjuvanted Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine for Adults over 65 in France.Vaccines · 2024Article
- Estimating the impact of influenza vaccination of low-risk 50-64-year-olds on acute and ICU hospital bed usage in an influenza season under endemic COVID-19 in the UK.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- Epidemiological drivers of transmissibility and severity of SARS-CoV-2 in England.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of the Use of Adjuvanted Quadrivalent Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults in Ireland.Vaccines · 2023Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Intranasal Live-Attenuated Influenza Vaccine for Children: A Systematic Review.Vaccines · 2022Review
- Article
- Burden of severe illness associated with laboratory confirmed influenza in adults aged 50-64 years: A rapid review.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2022Review
- The impact of COVID-19 vaccination in prisons in England and Wales: a metapopulation model.BMC public health · 2022Article
- An Economic Comparison of Influenza Vaccines Recommended for Use in Eligible Adults under 65 Years in the United Kingdom.Vaccines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe present study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of extending the pre-2013 influenza immunisation programme for high-risk and elderly individuals to those at low risk of developing complications following infection with seasonal influenza.
methodsWe performed an economic evaluation comparing different extensions of the pre-2013 influenza programme to seven possible age groups of low-risk individuals (aged 2-4 years, 50-64 years, 5-16 years, 2-4 and 50-64 years, 2-16 years, 2-16 and 50-64 years, and 2-64 years). These extensions are evaluated incrementally on four base scenarios (no vaccination, risk group only with coverage as observed between 1995 and 2009, risk group and 65+, and risk group with 75% coverage and 65+). Impact of vaccination is assessed using a transmission model built and parameterised from a previously published study. The study population is all individuals of all ages in England and Wales representing an average total of 52.6 million people over 14 influenza seasons (1995-2009).
resultsThe influenza programme (risk group and elderly) prior to 2013 is likely to be cost effective (incremental cost effectiveness ratio: 7,475 £/QALY, net benefit: 253 M£ [15-829]). Extension to any one of the low-risk target groups defined earlier is likely to be cost-effective. However, strategies that do not include vaccination of school-aged children are less likely to be cost-effective. The most efficient strategy is extension to the 5-16 year age group while universal vaccination (extension to all low-risk individuals over 2 years) will achieve the highest net benefit. While extension to the 2-16 year age group is likely to be very cost effective, the cost-effectiveness of extensions beyond 2-16 years is very uncertain. Extension to the 5-16 year age group would likely remain cost-effective even without herd immunity effects to other age groups. As our study includes a strong historical component, our results depend on the efficacy of the influenza vaccine remaining at levels similar to the ones achieved in the past over a long-period of time (assumed to vary between 28% and 70% depending of the circulating strains and age groups).
conclusionsMaking use of surveillance data from over a decade in conjunction with a dynamic model, we find that vaccination of children in the United Kingdom is likely to be highly cost-effective, not only for their own benefit but also to reduce the disease burden in the rest of the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.