Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26459005›Full record

ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta2016

Differential scanning calorimetry as a complementary diagnostic tool for the evaluation of biological samples.

Nichola C Garbett, Guy N Brock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nichola C GarbettJames Graham Brown Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. Electronic address: nichola.garbett@louisville.edu.
Guy N BrockDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. Electronic address: guy.brock@louisville.edu.

Funding

PROJ 12: STEM CELL-BASED VACCINE FOR CANCER PROPHYLAXISP20RR018733 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI ZACHARIAS, WOLFGANG · 2003 to 2011
$18.9M
PILOT PROJECT PROGRAMP30GM106396 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI EATON, JOHN W · 2013 to 2017
$5.4M
Molecular Targets COBREP20GM103482 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI MILLER, DONALD M. · 2012 to 2012
$2.0M
Plasma DSC for early detection of disease and therapeutic efficacy in melanomaR21CA187345 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI GARBETT, NICHOLA C. · 2014 to 2015
$359k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA187345NCI NIH HHS R21CA187345NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR018733NCRR NIH HHS P20RR018733NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103482NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM103482NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM106396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is a tool for measuring the thermal stability profiles of complex molecular interactions in biological fluids. DSC profiles (thermograms) of biofluids provide specific signatures which are being utilized as a new diagnostic approach for characterizing disease but the development of these approaches is still in its infancy.

methodsThis article evaluates several approaches for the analysis of thermograms which could increase the utility of DSC for clinical application. Thermograms were analyzed using localized thermogram features and principal components (PCs). The performance of these methods was evaluated alongside six models for the classification of a data set comprised of 300 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and 300 control subjects obtained from the Lupus Family Registry and Repository (LFRR).

resultsClassification performance was substantially higher using the penalized algorithms relative to localized features/PCs alone. The models were grouped into two sets, the first having smoother solution vectors but lower classification accuracies than the second with seemingly noisier solution vectors.

conclusionsCoupling thermogram technology with modern classification algorithms provides a powerful diagnostic approach for analysis of biological samples. The solution vectors from the models may reflect important information from the thermogram profiles for discriminating between clinical groups. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: DSC thermograms show sensitivity to changes in the bulk plasma proteome that correlate with clinical status. To move this technology towards clinical application the development of new approaches is needed to extract discriminatory parameters from DSC profiles for the comparison and diagnostic classification of patients.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsRegistriesBlood ProteinsCalorimetry, Differential ScanningCase-Control StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicPrincipal Component AnalysisProteomeThermodynamicsBlood ProteinsProteomeDiagnostic classificationDifferential scanning calorimetryPenalized classification methodsPlasma proteomeSystemic lupus erythematosusThermogram

Identifiers

PMID26459005
PMCPMC4799750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.