Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26458906›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2015

Assessment and model guided cancer screening promotion by village doctors in China: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Rui Feng, Xingrong Shen, Jing Chai, Penglai Chen, Jing Cheng, Han Liang, Ting Zhao, Rui Sha, Kaichun Li, Debin Wang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rui FengDepartment of Literature Review and Analysis, Library of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. 853571123@qq.com.
Xingrong ShenSchool of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. 1264854421@qq.com.
Jing ChaiSchool of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. jingchai82@sina.com.
Penglai ChenSchool of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. orangechenpl@aliyun.com.
Jing ChengSchool of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. jing_hp@sina.com.
Han LiangSchool of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. 1010066583@qq.com.
Ting ZhaoSchool of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. 1252509750@qq.com.
Rui ShaSchool of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. 1214984721@qq.com.
Kaichun LiLuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Luan, Anhui, China. 1350612172@163.com.
Debin WangSchool of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. dbwang@vip.sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProven cost-effectiveness contrasted by low uptake of cancer screening (CS) calls for new methodologies promoting the service. Contemporary interventions in this regard relies primarily on strategies targeting general or specific groups with limited attention being paid to individualized approaches. This trial tests a novel package promoting CS utilization via continuous and tailored counseling delivered by primary caregivers. It aims at demonstrating that high risk individuals in the intervention arm will, compared to those in the delayed intervention condition, show increased use of CS service. METHODS/

designThe trial adopts a quasi-randomized controlled trial design and involves 2160 high risk individuals selected, via rapid and detailed risk assessments, from about 72,000 farmers aged 35+ in 36 administrative villages randomized into equal intervention and delayed intervention arms. The CS intervention package uses: a) village doctors and village clinics to deliver personalized and thus relatively sophisticated CS counseling; b) two-stage risk assessment models in identifying high risk individuals to focus the intervention on the most needed; c) standardized operation procedures to guide conduct of counseling; d) real-time effectiveness and quality monitoring to leverage continuous improvement; e) web-based electronic system to enable prioritizing complex determinants of CS uptake and tailoring counseling sessions to the changing needs of individual farmers. The intervention arm receives baseline and semiannual follow up evaluations plus CS counseling for 5 years; while the delayed intervention arm, only the same baseline and follow-up evaluations for the first 5 years and CS counseling starting from the 6th year if the intervention proved effective. Evaluation measures include: CS uptake by high risk farmers and changes in their knowledge, perceptions and self-efficacy about CS. DISCUSSION: Given the complexity and heterogeneity in the determinant system of individual CS service seeking behavior, personalized interventions may prove to be an effective strategy. The current trial distinguishes itself from previous ones in that it not only adopts a personalized strategy but also introduces a package of pragmatic solutions based on proven theories for tackling potential barriers and incorporating key success factors in a synergetic way toward low cost, effective and sustainable CS promotion.

trial registrationISRCTN33269053.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningPhysicians, Primary CareChinaClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisCounselingHumansNeoplasmsRural Health ServicesWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID26458906
PMCPMC4603763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.