Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26458872›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2015

Evaluating the (cost-)effectiveness of guided and unguided Internet-based self-help for problematic alcohol use in employees--a three arm randomized controlled trial.

Leif Boß, Dirk Lehr, Matthias Berking, Heleen Riper, Michael Patrick Schaub, David Daniel Ebert

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Adolescents Confusion in Receiving Health Services: A Qualitative Study.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leif BoßDivision of Health Training Online, Innovation Incubator, Leuphana University Lueneburg, Rotenbleicherweg 67, D-21335, Lueneburg, Germany. boss@inkubator.leuphana.de.
Dirk LehrDivision of Health Training Online, Innovation Incubator, Leuphana University Lueneburg, Rotenbleicherweg 67, D-21335, Lueneburg, Germany. lehr@inkubator.leuphana.de.
Matthias BerkingDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Nägelsbachstraße 25a, D-90503, Erlangen, Germany. matthias.berking@fau.de.
Heleen RiperDivision of Health Training Online, Innovation Incubator, Leuphana University Lueneburg, Rotenbleicherweg 67, D-21335, Lueneburg, Germany. heleen.riper@inkubator.leuphana.de.
Michael Patrick SchaubSwiss Research Institute for Public Health and Addiction, University of Zurich, Konradstrasse 32, CH-8031, Zürich, Switzerland. michael.schaub@isgf.uzh.ch.
David Daniel EbertDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen Nuremberg, Nägelsbachstraße 25a, D-90503, Erlangen, Germany. david.ebert@fau.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProblematic alcohol consumption is associated with a high disease burden for affected individuals and has a detrimental impact on companies and society due to direct and indirect health costs. This protocol describes a study design to evaluate the (cost)-effectiveness of a guided and unguided Internet-based self-help intervention for employees called "GET.ON Clever weniger trinken" (be smart - drink less) compared to a waiting list control group.

methodsIn a three-arm randomized controlled trial, 528 German adults who are currently members of the workforce will be recruited by occupational health departments of major health insurance companies. Employees aged 18 and older displaying problematic drinking patterns (>21/14 drinks per week and an AUDIT score > 8/6 for men/women) will be randomly assigned to one of three following study conditions: 1. unguided web-based self-help for problematic drinking, 2. adherence-focused guided self-help, and 3. waiting list control. Self-report data will be collected at baseline (T1), 6 weeks (T2), and 6 months (T3) after randomization. The primary outcome will be the reduction of alcohol standard units during the 7 days prior to T2, using the Timeline Followback method. Cost-effectiveness analyses to determine direct and indirect costs will be conducted from the perspectives of employers and the society. Data will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis and per protocol. DISCUSSION: There is a need to identify effective low-threshold solutions to improve ill-health and reduce the negative economic consequences due to problematic alcohol drinking in workforces. If the proposed web-based intervention proves both to be efficacious and cost-effective, it may be a useful tool to increase utilization rates of interventions for problematic drinking in occupational settings.

trial registrationGerman Register of Clinical Studies (DRKS): DRKS00006105 , date of registration: 2014-07-07.

Indexed as

AdultAlcohol DrinkingCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGermanyHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesOccupational Health ServicesResearch DesignSelf ReportTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID26458872
PMCPMC4603803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.