Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26458732›Full record

ArticleThe journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians2016

Vaginal electrohysterography: the design and preliminary evaluation of a novel device for uterine contraction monitoring in an ovine model (.).

Nate Sunwoo, Karin Hwang, Karin J Blakemore, Abimbola Aina-Mumuney

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nate Sunwooa Johns Hopkins University School of Biomedical Engineering , Baltimore , MD , USA and.
Karin Hwanga Johns Hopkins University School of Biomedical Engineering , Baltimore , MD , USA and.
Karin J Blakemoreb Department of GYN/OB , Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Abimbola Aina-Mumuneyb Department of GYN/OB , Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Discerning Pathological and Braxton Hicks Contractions in Mid-Trimester GestationR41HD072684 · NICHD · CERVOCHECK, LLC · PI AINA-MUMUNEY, ABIMBOLA J · 2012 to 2012
$100k
NICHD NIH HHS R41 HD072684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTocodynamometry is the most common method of labor evaluation but most clinicians would agree it has limited utility before 26 weeks of gestation. The obesity epidemic has further reduced our ability to accurately detect uterine contractions using the tocodynamometer at any gestational age. We sought to design and test a novel contraction monitor that bypasses the maternal abdomen.

methodsAn optimized version of an intravaginal electrohysterographic ring device was tested in an ovine model. The device and its methodology as well as the tocodynamometer were validated against the current gold standard uterine activity monitor, the intrauterine pressure catheter in six sheep at varying gestational ages.

resultsBoth the intravaginal ring device and the tocodynamometer correlated well with IUPC, r = 0.69 and 0.73, respectively (p < 0.001). The number of contractions detected by each monitor remained similar even after accounting for confounders.

conclusionsThese results suggest that uterine activity can be monitored from the vaginal interface in an ovine model and offers an alternative clinical tool for the detection of contractions in situations, in which tocodynamometry would be ineffective or intrauterine monitoring inappropriate.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleModels, AnimalPregnancySheepUterine ContractionUterine MonitoringContraction monitoringelectrohysterographpreterm labortocodynamometryuterine contraction

Identifiers

PMID26458732
PMCPMC4882273
OpenAlexW2187931690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.