Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26458191›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2016

Motivation and substance use outcomes among adolescents in a school-based intervention.

Kelly Serafini, Leandra Shipley, David G Stewart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Predictive validity of the SOCRATES in a clinical sample of Latina/o adolescents.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly SerafiniYale University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT 06511, United States. Electronic address: kelly.serafini@yale.edu.
Leandra ShipleyVA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, United States.
David G StewartSeattle Pacific University, Department of Clinical Psychology, Seattle, WA 98119, United States.
Seattle Pacific University · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · USYale University · US

Funding

Research Training Fellowship in Substance use and Addiction (RTFSA)T32DA007238 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BRIAN D. KILUK, ISMENE L. PETRAKIS · 1988 to 2026
$5.7M
READY: SCHOOL-BASED SUBSTANCE ABUSE INTERVENTIONR03DA012974 · NIDA · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI STEWART, DAVID G · 2000 to 2001
$131k
NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA038218NIDA NIH HHS R03DA12974-01NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007238NIDA NIH HHS T32DA007238-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stages of change (Precontemplation, Contemplation, Preparation, Action, and Maintenance) have been well studied in adult populations. However, fewer studies have examined how the stages of change are related to adolescent substance use. Furthermore, there have been no studies that have examined how the stages of change relate to outcomes in a school-based intervention. To better capture adolescent motivation, we added an additional group to the Transtheoretical Model of Change, which we titled Coerced Action, to represent adolescents that made changes to their substance use despite low problem recognition (representing the internal motivation of Precontemplation and the change behaviors of the Action group). We then examined how the stages of change were related to a thorough assessment of substance use at baseline and corresponding treatment outcomes. Our sample consisted of 264 adolescents (mean age: 16.1, 44.5% Caucasian, 37.5% female) who participated in an 8-week, school-based Motivational Enhancement intervention. Results indicated significant group differences across the stages of change in substance use patterns (alcohol use, negative consequences, affective dysregulation), as well as treatment outcomes (alcohol use and negative consequences). For instance, adolescents in the Action group demonstrated more negative consequences at 16weeks follow-up than those in Precontemplation and Coerced Action, F(1, 3)=8.23, p<.001. The Coerced Action group reported the most alcohol use at 16weeks follow-up, although the finding was not significant when post-hoc tests were conducted. This study provides meaningful support for the assessment of motivation among adolescent substance users within school-based settings.

Indexed as

MotivationProgram EvaluationSchool Health ServicesAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescenceAlcoholMarijuanaMotivationStages of changeSubstance useTranstheoretical Model of Change

Identifiers

PMID26458191
PMCPMC4679608
OpenAlexW1821247086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.