Observational studyAnnals of internal medicine2015
Outcomes of Basic Versus Advanced Life Support for Out-of-Hospital Medical Emergencies.
Observational study in Annals of internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced Life Support vs. Basic Life Support for Patients With Trauma in Prehospital Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- A national assessment of legacy versus new generation Medicaid data.Health services research · 2022Article
- The use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for non-traumatic cardiac arrest: A review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020Review
- Mistriaged Advanced Life Support Patients in a Two-Tiered, Suburban Emergency Medical Services System.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Health system factors associated with post-trauma mortality at the prehospital care level in Africa: a scoping review.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2020Article
- Going to the nearest hospital vs. designated trauma centre for road traffic crashes: estimating the time difference in Delhi, India.International journal of injury control and safety promotion · 2019Article
- Instrumental variables: The power of wishful thinking vs the confounded reality of comparative effectiveness research.Health services research · 2019Article
- Collecting core data in physician-staffed pre-hospital helicopter emergency medical services using a consensus-based template: international multicentre feasibility study in Finland and Norway.BMC health services research · 2019Observational
- Theoretical knowledge and psychomotor skill acquisition of basic life support training programme among secondary school students.World journal of emergency medicine · 2019Article
- The care and transport of trauma victims by layperson emergency medical systems: a qualitative study in Delhi, India.BMJ global health · 2019Article
- Prehospital Care and Emergency Department Door-to-Antibiotic Time in Sepsis.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Geographic Variation in Use of Ambulance Transport to the Emergency Department.Annals of emergency medicine · 2017Article
- Delays in Emergency Care and Mortality during Major U.S. Marathons.The New England journal of medicine · 2017Article
- False Dichotomies and Health Policy Research Designs: Randomized Trials Are Not Always the Answer.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017Article
- The Reliability of Instrumental Variables in Health Care Effectiveness Research: Less Is More.Health services research · 2017Article
- Stone Throwing in the Glass House.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2016Review
- Is Prehospital Advanced Life Support Harmful?Annals of internal medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost Medicare patients seeking emergency medical transport are treated by ambulance providers trained in advanced life support (ALS). Evidence supporting the superiority of ALS over basic life support (BLS) is limited, but some studies suggest ALS may harm patients.
objectiveTo compare outcomes after ALS and BLS in out-of-hospital medical emergencies.
designObservational study with adjustment for propensity score weights and instrumental variable analyses based on county-level variations in ALS use.
settingTraditional Medicare. PATIENTS: 20% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries from nonrural counties between 2006 and 2011 with major trauma, stroke, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or respiratory failure. MEASUREMENTS: Neurologic functioning and survival to 30 days, 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years.
resultsExcept in cases of AMI, patients showed superior unadjusted outcomes with BLS despite being older and having more comorbidities. In propensity score analyses, survival to 90 days among patients with trauma, stroke, and respiratory failure was higher with BLS than ALS (6.1 percentage points [95% CI, 5.4 to 6.8 percentage points] for trauma; 7.0 percentage points [CI, 6.2 to 7.7 percentage points] for stroke; and 3.7 percentage points [CI, 2.5 to 4.8 percentage points] for respiratory failure). Patients with AMI did not exhibit differences in survival at 30 days but had better survival at 90 days with ALS (1.0 percentage point [CI, 0.1 to 1.9 percentage points]). Neurologic functioning favored BLS for all diagnoses. Results from instrumental variable analyses were broadly consistent with propensity score analyses for trauma and stroke, showed no survival differences between BLS and ALS for respiratory failure, and showed better survival at all time points with BLS than ALS for patients with AMI. LIMITATION: Only Medicare beneficiaries from nonrural counties were studied.
conclusionAdvanced life support is associated with substantially higher mortality for several acute medical emergencies than BLS. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Science Foundation, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and National Institutes of Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.