Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26457511›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications2015

Analysis of crystallization data in the Protein Data Bank.

Jobie Kirkwood, David Hargreaves, Simon O'Keefe, Julie Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Computational crystallization.Archives of biochemistry and biophysics · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jobie KirkwoodDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, York YO10 5DD, England.
David HargreavesAstraZeneca, Darwin Building, Cambridge Science Park, Cambridge CB4 0WG, England.
Simon O'KeefeDepartment of Computer Science, University of York, York YO10 5DD, England.
Julie WilsonDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, York YO10 5DD, England.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I015868/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Protein Data Bank (PDB) is the largest available repository of solved protein structures and contains a wealth of information on successful crystallization. Many centres have used their own experimental data to draw conclusions about proteins and the conditions in which they crystallize. Here, data from the PDB were used to reanalyse some of these results. The most successful crystallization reagents were identified, the link between solution pH and the isoelectric point of the protein was investigated and the possibility of predicting whether a protein will crystallize was explored.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinStatistics as TopicAmmonium SulfateCrystallizationHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIsoelectric PointPolyethylene GlycolsAmmonium SulfatePolyethylene Glycolscrystallizationdatadatabaseisoelectric pointPDBpHproteinsstatistics

Identifiers

PMID26457511
PMCPMC4601584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.