Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26457290›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

Determination of the optimal case definition for the diagnosis of end-stage renal disease from administrative claims data in Manitoba, Canada.

Paul Komenda, Nancy Yu, Stella Leung, Keevin Bernstein, James Blanchard, Manish Sood, Claudio Rigatto, Navdeep Tangri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Long-Term Kidney Outcomes after Pediatric Acute Kidney Injury.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paul KomendaSection of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man. ; Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, Man.
Nancy YuDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
Stella LeungDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
Keevin BernsteinSection of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man. ; Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Man.
James BlanchardSeven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, Man.
Manish SoodSection of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man. ; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
Claudio RigattoSection of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man. ; Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, Man.
Navdeep TangriSection of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man. ; Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, Man. ; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEnd-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a major public health problem with increasing prevalence and costs. An understanding of the long-term trends in dialysis rates and outcomes can help inform health policy. We determined the optimal case definition for the diagnosis of ESRD using administrative claims data in the province of Manitoba over a 7-year period.

methodsWe determined the sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and overall accuracy of 4 administrative case definitions for the diagnosis of ESRD requiring chronic dialysis over different time horizons from Jan. 1, 2004, to Mar. 31, 2011. The Manitoba Renal Program Database served as the gold standard for confirming dialysis status.

resultsDuring the study period, 2562 patients were registered as recipients of chronic dialysis in the Manitoba Renal Program Database. Over a 1-year period (2010), the optimal case definition was any 2 claims for outpatient dialysis, and it was 74.6% sensitive (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.3%-76.9%) and 94.4% specific (95% CI 93.6%-95.2%) for the diagnosis of ESRD. In contrast, a case definition of at least 2 claims for dialysis treatment more than 90 days apart was 64.8% sensitive (95% CI 62.2%-67.3%) and 97.1% specific (95% CI 96.5%-97.7%). Extending the period to 5 years greatly improved sensitivity for all case definitions, with minimal change to specificity; for example, for the optimal case definition of any 2 claims for dialysis treatment, sensitivity increased to 86.0% (95% CI 84.7%-87.4%) at 5 years.

conclusionAccurate case definitions for the diagnosis of ESRD requiring dialysis can be derived from administrative claims data. The optimal definition required any 2 claims for outpatient dialysis. Extending the claims period to 5 years greatly improved sensitivity with minimal effects on specificity for all case definitions.

Identifiers

PMID26457290
PMCPMC4596097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.