ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2015
Triple Duty: Integrating Graduate Medical Education With Maintenance of Board Certification to Improve Clinician Communication at Hospital Discharge.
Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- What do readers need? Qualitative requirements of medical discharge summaries from the recipients' perspective.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplete and accurate discharge summaries can improve communication and continuity of care between inpatient and ambulatory settings as well as reduce adverse events. However, discharge summaries commonly lack key information.
objectiveTo determine if a quality improvement intervention that actively engages residents and attending physicians would improve the timeliness and quality of hospital discharge summaries at our academic children's hospital, and would help trainees and clinicians complete educational requirements.
methodsElectronic health record queries were used to assess time to completion of discharge summaries. A total of 120 discharge summaries from 36 eligible residents were reviewed by 9 attending pediatricians using an objective discharge summary scoring instrument. Improvement was facilitated through monthly learning sessions and Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles.
resultsThe proportion of summaries completed within 24 hours of discharge increased from 38% to 73%; mean discharge summary scores improved from 54% to 99%; and percentage of summaries that included all 13 elements in the scoring instrument increased from 0% to 80%. All elements most likely to be deficient at baseline showed a higher likelihood of being included in summaries following the intervention. The rate of summaries that were scored as containing appropriate detail and being an appropriate length also increased from 0% to 80%. The 9 attending pediatricians received maintenance of certification credits for their participation.
conclusionsA multifaceted quality improvement intervention, which included stakeholder involvement, clinician education, standardization of documentation, policy changes, and provision of board certification credits, improved the quality and timeliness of discharge summaries at our academic children's hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.