Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26457017›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Biomarkers for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Nobuhiro Tsuchiya, Yu Sawada, Itaru Endo, Keigo Saito, Yasushi Uemura, Tetsuya Nakatsura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 304 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
304citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

304 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. FeCurrent cancer drug targets · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

244 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nobuhiro TsuchiyaNobuhiro Tsuchiya, Yu Sawada, Itaru Endo, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 236-0027, Japan.
Yu SawadaNobuhiro Tsuchiya, Yu Sawada, Itaru Endo, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 236-0027, Japan.
Itaru EndoNobuhiro Tsuchiya, Yu Sawada, Itaru Endo, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 236-0027, Japan.
Keigo SaitoNobuhiro Tsuchiya, Yu Sawada, Itaru Endo, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 236-0027, Japan.
Yasushi UemuraNobuhiro Tsuchiya, Yu Sawada, Itaru Endo, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 236-0027, Japan.
Tetsuya NakatsuraNobuhiro Tsuchiya, Yu Sawada, Itaru Endo, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 236-0027, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Although the prognosis of patients with HCC is generally poor, the 5-year survival rate is > 70% if patients are diagnosed at an early stage. However, early diagnosis of HCC is complicated by the coexistence of inflammation and cirrhosis. Thus, novel biomarkers for the early diagnosis of HCC are required. Currently, the diagnosis of HCC without pathological correlation is achieved by analyzing serum α-fetoprotein levels combined with imaging techniques. Advances in genomics and proteomics platforms and biomarker assay techniques over the last decade have resulted in the identification of numerous novel biomarkers and have improved the diagnosis of HCC. The most promising biomarkers, such as glypican-3, osteopontin, Golgi protein-73 and nucleic acids including microRNAs, are most likely to become clinically validated in the near future. These biomarkers are not only useful for early diagnosis of HCC, but also provide insight into the mechanisms driving oncogenesis. In addition, such molecular insight creates the basis for the development of potentially more effective treatment strategies. In this article, we provide an overview of the biomarkers that are currently used for the early diagnosis of HCC.

Indexed as

alpha-FetoproteinsAnnexin A2Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularEarly Detection of CancerFibrosisGlypicansHumansInflammationLiver NeoplasmsMembrane ProteinsMicroRNAsMidkineNerve Growth Factorsacarboxyprothrombinalpha-FetoproteinsAnnexin A2Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorGlypicansGOLM1 protein, humanGPC3 protein, humanMDK protein, humanMembrane ProteinsMicroRNAsMidkineNerve Growth FactorsOsteopontinProtein PrecursorsProthrombinReceptors, Urokinase Plasminogen ActivatorSerpinsSPP1 protein, humansquamous cell carcinoma-related antigenThioredoxinsBiomarkerDes-γ-carboxyprothrombinGlypican-3Golgi protein-73Hepatocellular carcinomaMicroRNAsOsteopontinSquamous cell carcinoma antigenα-fetoproteinα-fetoprotein-L3

Identifiers

PMID26457017
PMCPMC4588079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.