Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26456991›Full record

ArticleNuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms2015

An Interface for the Direct Coupling of Small Liquid Samples to AMS.

T J Ognibene, A T Thomas, P F Daley, G Bench, K W Turteltaub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Identification and Quantitation ofMethods and protocols · 2025
    Article
  3. OpticalAnalytical chemistry · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. HPLC-Parallel accelerator and molecular mass spectrometry analysis ofJournal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Trials and Tribulations in the First Three Years in Operation of the SSAMS for BiomedicalNuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

T J OgnibeneCenter for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave, Livermore, CA 94551.
A T ThomasCenter for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave, Livermore, CA 94551.
P F DaleyCenter for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave, Livermore, CA 94551.
G BenchCenter for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave, Livermore, CA 94551.
K W TurteltaubBiology and Biotechnology Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave, Livermore, CA 94551.

Funding

Resource for the Development of Biomedical Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS)P41GM103483 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRNC LVRMR NAT LAB · PI TURTELTAUB, KENNETH W. · 2012 to 2019
$12.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the moving wire interface attached to the 1-MV AMS system at LLNL's Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry for the analysis of nonvolatile liquid samples as either discrete drops or from the direct output of biochemical separatory instrumentation, such as high-performance liquid chromatography. Discrete samples containing at least a few 10s of nanograms of carbon and as little as 50 zmol

Indexed as

14Caccelerator mass spectrometryCO2HPLC interfaces

Identifiers

PMID26456991
PMCPMC4594830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.